Chat archive · 2019-06

burek99_ · · #92413

this is new record! my machines are working 10 days in a row without switching to backup pool :)

Chris Sokolowski · · #92414

burek99_ wrote: this is new record! my machines are working 10 days in a row without switching to backup pool :)
Sorry I had to break your record; I needed to restart the mining server to apply an update. We now support payouts in the new Binancechain. The old Binancecoin has been renamed to "Binancecoin_ERC20". I have also renamed CryptoBlastcoin to Blastcoin as requested by the developer.

Forum notification · · #92415

has started a new topic: reddcoin payment

Forum notification · · #92417

has started a new topic: Binance Payouts wrong.

moonshot · · #92418

"All algorithms for this coin are disabled or in error." for several coins including Viacoin and NewYorkCoin

Steve Sokolowski · · #92419

moonshot wrote: "All algorithms for this coin are disabled or in error." for several coins including Viacoin and NewYorkCoin
There’s a bug in the mining server that was uncovered after we fixed a different bug reported by Charles Fulnecky - I’m going to investigate it this afternoon

djliss · · #92420

whats going on with equihash 144-5??

djliss · · #92421

Connected to prohashing.com:3345 18:06:31 Subscribed to Stratum Server 18:06:31 Set Nonce: 08040fad 18:06:31 Connection Error: End of file

Steve Sokolowski · · #92422

djliss wrote: Connected to prohashing.com:3345 18:06:31 Subscribed to Stratum Server 18:06:31 Set Nonce: 08040fad 18:06:31 Connection Error: End of file
There are some coins that are in error, placing some algorithms in error where there are no coins to be mined, due to a mining server bug that was uncovered when we fixed a bug that would prevent that issue from ever occurring - Chris is going to restart the mining servers in a few minutes to resolve the issue

Forum notification · · #92423

has started a new topic: XLM Payout not happening HELP!

Forum notification · · #92424

has started a new topic: Some forums changes

Forum notification · · #92426

Forum notification · · #92428

olkah · · #92429

Pool not working !!!!!

olkah · · #92430

The pool is not running and is completely out of order

Forum notification · · #92432

has started a new topic: Connect Fine but no Hash?

olkah · · #92433

no payouts

olkah · · #92434

:oops: :oops:

davidsin · · #92435

hey if I had a 550 MH/s L3 running for 24hr how much litecoin would I be paid out here?

jtback · · #92436

So when is NewYorkCoin gonna take off?

olkah · · #92437

again, pool is not working

olkah · · #92438

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

dohckiller10 · · #92439

was making 4-5$ a day with prohashing and now mining on slushpool i make 8-9$ a day. i feel i been robbed mining for months on prohashing

pedrosantos · · #92440

All miners are down *** all pool hashrate is zero

lauffer · · #92441

omg, again

pedrosantos · · #92442

Can any administrator post an update of the problem ?

KEBKR · · #92443

What’s happening. Miners show that the stratum are alive but nothing on the website. Is it just a website issue or should I switch pools?

Forum notification · · #92444

has started a new topic: System was offline

Steve Sokolowski · · #92445

Chris will be performing a mining server restart to try to resolve an issue that might have been caused by this morning’s problems - some customers are seeing "live mining status" display no workers

olkah · · #92446

again, pool is not working :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Steve Sokolowski · · #92447

the system is offline due to the restart I just discussed

Forum notification · · #92448

has started a new topic: System offline

Steve Sokolowski · · #92451

olkah, thanks for your comments, but you’re posting without any context, and you’ve been warned about that before. We’ll be glad to assist you in a support ticket, and to help if you can provide context and detail for the issues you're having, but otherwise I’m going to start removing your chat comments - thanks!

Forum notification · · #92452

has started a new topic: Increased scrypt payouts by 1%

komodo01 · · #92453

Hello.now we have 15 to 22% delta on nicehash. When the NYC does not work, the delta decreases. When the NYC delta increases by 6.7%. Turn off the nyc, we lose big money

Steve Sokolowski · · #92455

komodo01 wrote: Hello.now we have 15 to 22% delta on nicehash. When the NYC does not work, the delta decreases. When the NYC delta increases by 6.7%. Turn off the nyc, we lose big money
Hi, how are you determining that NewYorkCoin is the cause of the problem? It’s not possible to "turn it off" in dynamic mining mode, and it can’t be statically mined, so I’m not clear how you obtained your comparison. Could you clarify? Also, I deleted your second comment because it violated the rule of treating others with respect.

komodo01 · · #92456

When I did not work on a graviex wallet, the delta decreased by 5% to 7%. That’s when NYC did not work. If I only left enough money to merge, the delta would be reduced to 3%. In your place, I would leave only doge like other big pools

komodo01 · · #92457

For a very long mining and the main reason for the delta are merge coins. When all the merge coins are excluded, there is no delta. Only doges are worth holding. There are no value, the greater loss is on the delta. The majority of the large pools have understood and hold only doge

komodo01 · · #92458

I do not know what I wrote badly in the comment that you deleted? I use the google translator and maybe that’s the reason, I do not insult it. I’m sorry. But when you turn off all the merge coins, mining on nicehash, the delta will be 0 or a minimum of 2.3 %. Check. Actually, there is no reason to keep merge coins. Doge(about 3% gives the delta) are the only worth

Steve Sokolowski · · #92459

The "Delta," from what I understand, is related to NiceHash’s estimate of how much mining time is lost due to work restarts. But since work restarts aren’t being sent when a new NewYorkcoin block is available, that won’t affect the "delta" value

komodo01 · · #92460

Incorrect. Exclude all merge coins. You will not have a delta. I gave the NYC as an example, because it’s a bigger delta than other coin coins. And the doge has a big delta. You write something and you have not checked. I checked it all.

komodo01 · · #92461

The biggest problem for me is delta. It is 16.17% on your pool. When there would not be a delta, what would it cost to earn? And why to keep a free money free and lose it on the delta? I understand doges, the block is 0.004 and the rest do not give together So much for the whole day. But if you do not want to check and make a pool without delta (and you have a delta for years, and 5 years ago we wrote about this) then that’s your problem

komodo01 · · #92462

Merge coins made sense in 2017 when bitmark, doge and others had enormous value. We had profit, did not bother the delta. Now we lose 15% hash due to worthless merge blocks. When you check the delta with merge coins and no merge coins, you will see the difference. 2012 was right(nicehash, you remembeer this) when he claimed to be the pool make delta with extra reward Then the pools had hidden merge coins of money and the miners had a huge delta. Private pools without merge had never had a delta.When you check, write in public that I wrote the truth. Hello

vhmanu · · #92463

nicehash hates pools that switch. Has nothing to do with merge mining. Those restarts get punished by Nicehash and this is your "delta"

vhmanu · · #92464

and i guess you use g=off ?

komodo01 · · #92465

It’s not true, the delta depends on the merge of a coin. After 2 years I was mining on private pools and when I asked to turn off the blending blocks, I did not have a delta. You write something you do not know and NEVER checked.

komodo01 · · #92466

no blending(merge)mistake google transalate

komodo01 · · #92467

When you go to a fixed hash, one coin miner, you also have a delta of 15.18%, so the switch you write is not correct

komodo01 · · #92468

If he wants an administrator or owner of this pool, I will prove to him that the merge coins give the delta and will get the exact% of the delta that each merge coin gives. My claim can be proved by mining rather than by you by definitions and opinions.

vhmanu · · #92469

no you are wrong. i often mine static coins with nicehash and never experience a negative delta. Nicehash punishes frequent work restarts. Just use g=off and your issue with merge mining is (almost) gone when you use nicehash

komodo01 · · #92470

I’ve checked everything and I can not make a mistake. Each merge coin gives 1 to 5% delta

komodo01 · · #92471

Miners on some pool without merge coins (no hidden) and you will see 2% delta

komodo01 · · #92472

Let’s bet in 0.5 btc?

komodo01 · · #92473

The reason for my writing is just that there is a higher hash here. We find the blocks ltc.A it can be obtained when there is no delta

komodo01 · · #92474

The only non-delta merge coin is GLT. That’s why all large pools are held by him.I’ve been doing this business for 8 years

ajs · · #92476

komodo01 wrote: I’ve checked everything and I can not make a mistake. Each merge coin gives 1 to 5% delta
Please read https://prohashing.com/help.html#tuning-passwordargs section on the password argument "g" and carefully re-read what @vhmanu has said.

PolakCrypto · · #92477

is minimum payout for bitcoin correct now that things have slowed down a bit? like around $3 minimum withdraw is ok?

komodo01 · · #92479

ajs wrote:
komodo01 wrote: I’ve checked everything and I can not make a mistake. Each merge coin gives 1 to 5% delta
Please read https://prohashing.com/help.html#tuning-passwordargs section on the password argument "g" and carefully re-read what @vhmanu has said.
I tried with g = off, the same is a huge delta. The only reason for the delta is MERGE coins, and that is the fact. The administrator of this site NEVER checked DELTA without the coin of a coin. Each merge coin gives 1% to 5% of the delta, and this is a fact. Here mines the worthless merge coins and loses huge money on the delta

komodo01 · · #92480

I offered a bet of 0.5 btc. Let’s bet. I claim that the merge coins are the reason for a huge delta, you write that they are not. Can we bet?

Steve Sokolowski · · #92481

in regards to the deltas, if you use "g=off," you will probably achieve a lower "delta," but NiceHash has always overestimated its delta

Steve Sokolowski · · #92482

its deltas are far above what amount of money is actually lost due to the restarts, and therefore the only way to resolve that would be to hurt direct miners by making them earn slightly less money

Steve Sokolowski · · #92483

our focus continues to be on making as much money for direct miners as possible, so I hope you can understand our reluctance to make changes that benefit NiceHash miners at the expense of direct miners

olkah · · #92484

@ Steve Sokolowski how about adding new algorithms to the pool ?

komodo01 · · #92485

15 to 20% is no less, it’s huge money. If you only left doges, which is the only valuable, the delta would be 5% .g = off is frivolous as the delta is again high. I still did not get the answer, are you once checked the delta without merge coins?. I’m 100 times and no delta. The loss of 15% of the money due to 0.5% of the money from the merge is meaningless. This is 2019 not 2017 when the Merge was worth

komodo01 · · #92486

Consider why large pools threw out mergecoins, left small pools to take miners with 1.2 asics.No merge coins would have 10 th hash on the ltc. Because nh miners with 5% delta immediately mined. You can throw out the worthless passes, nyc, and similar

Steve Sokolowski · · #92487

I understand your frustration - but again, we aren’t willing to make any changes that improve NiceHash profitability at the expense of direct miners’ profitability, no matter how small

Steve Sokolowski · · #92488

our focus has always been on serving direct miners, and the mining server computes whether money will be lost for direct miners by using work restart times

Steve Sokolowski · · #92489

NiceHash’s deltas are not overpenalizing for the work restarts and therefore our calculations switch work too frequently for Nicehash miners

komodo01 · · #92490

What is the reason for holding worthless merge coins on the pool? Merge coins have no value. It only doge have. Answer me, please

Steve Sokolowski · · #92491

I’m not sure how better to explain this issue, unfortunately :(

Steve Sokolowski · · #92492

while the other coins are worth less, the mining server uses the value of the coins to determine whether a work restart is warranted

Steve Sokolowski · · #92493

and as I said, Nicehash does not have the correct penalty for the actual losses due to work restarts

komodo01 · · #92494

What is the value of the passeta? Do you receive $ 0,0003 per day? How much value do you have rest merge coins?

Steve Sokolowski · · #92495

I don’t know

Steve Sokolowski · · #92496

it would take some time to calculate that

Steve Sokolowski · · #92497

but as I said, the unit tests prove that restarts only occur when the amount to be earned is greater than the mining time lost

Steve Sokolowski · · #92498

if you want to use cloud mining services, we do support MiningRigRentals and I suggest that you use them instead of Nicehash

komodo01 · · #92499

My brain can not understand that the value of $ 10 a day of all merge coins, without a dog, is more than 15.20% of the delta

Steve Sokolowski · · #92500

again, I’ll repeat that Nicehash’s delta is not an accurate representation of what miners lose due to work restarts

komodo01 · · #92501

mining rental has a higher price of 15.20%

Steve Sokolowski · · #92502

we don’t make changes for Nicehash because they were unwilling to compensate us when their service was used for a 51% attack

komodo01 · · #92503

It was not true. I had a private pool for 4 years. When I dropped the merges, I did not have a delta and nicehash always gave 98% hash that I am paying for

Steve Sokolowski · · #92504

I’m not sure what happened with that pool, so I can’t help you there

Steve Sokolowski · · #92505

all I can say is that we aren’t willing to spend any time resolving this issue because we do not make changes for Nicehash

komodo01 · · #92506

so you added an unprotected coin that had a successful 51%

Steve Sokolowski · · #92507

I’m sorry to disappoint you - you can feel free to ask for support with Miningrigrentals or use Nicehash without support

komodo01 · · #92508

Just answer the question, how many dollars do you get from the paseta per day? The whole pool. Do you get 0.0003 dollars? The bandage says 2% delta

Steve Sokolowski · · #92509

I need to get back to work on something else - feel free to talk about a different topic if you’d like and I’ll chime in; there’s nothing more to add about this topic

komodo01 · · #92510

pls answer

komodo01 · · #92511

onlky answer

Steve Sokolowski · · #92512

olkah wrote: @ Steve Sokolowski how about adding new algorithms to the pool ?
we’re focusing on eliminating bugs right now and on July 3 and 4 are having a big meeting to discuss where to go from there

Steve Sokolowski · · #92513

the biggest problem with adding new algorithms, like X16R, is that the algorithms don’t have enough coins that are traded on exchanges that accept US customers

Steve Sokolowski · · #92514

many of these algorithms trade on no exchanges or only on exchanges that prohibit US customers

komodo01 · · #92515

So your decision is to remain a small pool with no goal to mince the ltc with a big hash. You are satisfied with the worthless coins. Do you have to inform the miners that MERGE coins are the reason for the delta. Do not write any more that the delta is due to some other things, It’s delta because of the merge coins. That’s what I proved. You should not bet at 0.5 btc.Hello

Steve Sokolowski · · #92516

komodo01 wrote: So your decision is to remain a small pool with no goal to mince the ltc with a big hash. You are satisfied with the worthless coins. Do you have to inform the miners that MERGE coins are the reason for the delta. Do not write any more that the delta is due to some other things, It’s delta because of the merge coins. That’s what I proved. You should not bet at 0.5 btc.Hello
again, I ask you to stop posting about this - I already stated four times that we are not willing to make changes solely for Nicehash compatibility - feel free to talk about other topics or you’ll have to be banned from chat - thanks!

olkah · · #92517

@ Steve Sokolowski I hope you make the right decision and add already CRYPTONOTE algorithm which is discussed here for about a year.

olkah · · #92518

the price of BTC rose. This I mean that in the winter you said that if the price of BTC will rise then we will be able to hire someone to do this :)

olkah · · #92519

and the list of coins for the CRYPTONOTE algorithm is quite impressive http://prntscr.com/o077xl and that’s not all the coins

PolakCrypto · · #92520

@steve has the bitcoin payout proportions been lowered so we can get usual payouts now? I remember you mentioned minimum was $80 at one point..looks like its not anymore

PolakCrypto · · #92521

minimum for "FREE" payout it is now i believe