I was told to submit support tickets. My user names are MoMoney and MoeMoney

What info do you need?

I was told to submit support tickets

thanks again for the quick turnaround Steve

Thanks for the tickets. After looking at the usernames you provided, I found that the mining server that served both of your IP addresses had crashed for an unknown reason, so I restarted it.

Steve Sokolowski wrote: Please submit support tickets about these two issues because we aren’t aware of any widespread problems. We’ll be glad to assist in troubleshooting individual issues!

UST-7436

Steve Sokolowski wrote: Please submit support tickets about these two issues because we aren’t aware of any widespread problems. We’ll be glad to assist in troubleshooting individual issues!

UST-7435

keydric wrote: Anyone else unable to connect miners with Scrypt? Looks like 2 hours now maybe

yes ME!

Please submit support tickets about these two issues because we aren’t aware of any widespread problems. We’ll be glad to assist in troubleshooting individual issues!

Anyone else unable to connect miners with Scrypt? Looks like 2 hours now maybe

hi steve, could you take a look on AIB’s issue, it has been halt for 2 months now.

has started a new topic: Coinbase issue resolved

you cna expect a delay until tomorrow for it to be re-enabled

mstrozier wrote: possibly as now it’s disabled from the pool.

Chris is working on this coin; the entire blockchain needs to be redownloaded because it forked, and it will take a day to do that

possibly as now it’s disabled from the pool.

ETC had an update recently, that may be the reason...

has started a new topic: Best Cryptocurrency Exchange

Well seems to be reporting correctly now.

further tested this. Now setting static coins c=callisto works. c=ethereum works. c=ethereumclassic fails. Not sure what’s up but ETC just cycles through and not hashing.

I noticed this @ 8:15pm Eastern time 1/18/2020

Ethash on ETC coin seems to have issue. Getting error :ETH:: No new jobs were received for 10 minutes, something is wrong with the pool. Claymore miner then disconnects / reconnects. Mining static Callisto on my other rig working fine. But currently not on the profit switching default.

has started a new topic: 120 FREE SPINS BetHash.io | $4,000 GiftBox | Lottery | Dice | Slots

has started a new topic: Rent sha256

mstrozier wrote: I’m referring to the full block reward. Not fully sure what block reward is reporting under historic blocks found under dashboard. Beside the coin it shows Block reward, is that suppose to match the actual blockchain reward for that coin?

No. It’s supposed to match whatever we earn. There is additional money in the block reward, but for Callisto that extra money goes to someone else, and therefore isn’t relevant to our calculations.

JiveTonto wrote: @Steve Sokolowski :  Why were all my yesterdays rewards forfeited?

We’re not aware of any forfeitures - but you can submit a support ticket and we’ll be glad to assist!

I saw it almost 100% and the value was showing on your live charts, then within a couple hours or so, its like you guys flipped a switch and took the profits away

why is it not profitable to mine bitcoin gold on your pool? ant that the profits earnings doesnt match what value the coin went up yesterday

@Steve Sokolowski :  Why were all my yesterdays rewards forfeited?

I’m referring to the full block reward. Not fully sure what block reward is reporting under historic blocks found under dashboard. Beside the coin it shows Block reward, is that suppose to match the actual blockchain reward for that coin?

Before I do, could you confirm that you’re referring to the actual reward the miners get, and not the full block reward, which for Callisto includes outputs that go to other people?

mstrozier wrote: Morning. Not sure if the Callisto Block rewards are correct. They were changed to the correct value from 420 to 233. However this morning I noticed in my feeds it is now reporting 129.6 in prohashing instead of 233.

I’ll ask Chris to investigate and get back to you shortly

Morning. Not sure if the Callisto Block rewards are correct. They were changed to the correct value from 420 to 233. However this morning I noticed in my feeds it is now reporting 129.6 in prohashing instead of 233.

has started a new topic: Why is Digibyte not working

Tron Odyssey-v3.6.6 was released today 13th of Jan 2020. This is a forced upgrade https://github.com/tronprotocol/java-tr ... sey-v3.6.6

has started a new topic: Status as of Monday, January 13, 2020

in some cases, no referenced sites were provided, so those tickets were closed - feel free to submit tickets about other issues, but there are no known problems with profitability at this time - thanks!

we spent 6 hours revieweing all of the various issues about profitability and have not found any errors in the system, with the system paying more than the referenced sites in all circumstances

creader wrote: and i dont mean your calculation....i mean my income on your Site with scrypt was half of normal

We’re looking into this issue, but it’s an extremely complex problem that we can’t reproduce, so I apologize for taking a few days to get back to you

and i dont mean your calculation....i mean my income on your Site with scrypt was half of normal

Steve Sokolowski wrote: there were some reports of calculators displaying different data, but the issue is on hold because nobody has yet provided a URL of a site that has the problem

whattomine.com coinwarz.com

there were some reports of calculators displaying different data, but the issue is on hold because nobody has yet provided a URL of a site that has the problem

creader wrote: mining scrypt 6 hours with ~4.4ghs only gives me only 1$here...diffrent calculators saying it must be >2.2$ !!?...do you have some issues?

Could you provide an exact URL to the calculator that shows these figures?

mining scrypt 6 hours with ~4.4ghs only gives me only 1$here...diffrent calculators saying it must be >2.2$ !!?...do you have some issues?

Graviex _NataliaLast Thursday at 11:23 AM @Bibi Hello. Full order-book requests (like /api/v2/order_book and/or /api/v3/order_book) has been moved into the category of private API. Please, generate your private API key (token) (https://graviex.net/api_tokens) to proceed with these requests.

Steve Sokolowski wrote:

moonshot wrote: What is the issue with Graviex? Is it temporary?

Unfortunately not - Graviex’s API has poor connectivity and we can’t trade with it or get prices a lot of the time, so coins that are Graviex-exclusive are offline then

has started a new topic: Linda Coin has been rebranded

mstrozier wrote: Afternoon. I noticed on Etash algo, Callisto is showing up as block reward of 420. Isn’t the current block reward for Callisto currently 233.40 not 420?

Thanks - Chris will check that

Afternoon. I noticed on Etash algo, Callisto is showing up as block reward of 420. Isn’t the current block reward for Callisto currently 233.40 not 420?

moonshot wrote: What is the issue with Graviex? Is it temporary?

Unfortunately not - Graviex’s API has poor connectivity and we can’t trade with it or get prices a lot of the time, so coins that are Graviex-exclusive are offline then

thanks for your patience

siberianbreaks wrote:

flnvaz wrote: hello everyone. I am newer to prohash but not new to mining and after running for a month I was able to determine that my payouts/earnings were roughly 50% less than what they should have been. In order to see this bug you can go to tool, pretend your setting up a new miner and use something you can easily reference such as an antMiner S17+ 73TH/s miner. When you enter all of the information to get your miner online prohash only shows that the miner will earn an Estimated Overall revenue, excluding electric is $3.81 however all of the mining calculator out there clearly show an earning of $9.57 per day in revenue. This is based on nothing other than block difficultties and hashing power. The difference from $3.81 to $9.57 is a crazy spread of more than 50%. Has anyone else noticed this issue? At first I thought maybe it was justt the calculator glitching but then I checked my earnings on 55TH/s of power combibed with 150GH/s of X11 power and I have never made more than $11 in a day. That math is incredibly wrong and it most certainly is not a 2% fee. What gives?

I notice this before, This pool is paying much less than they adviced on live profitability section

There was a ticket about this submitted and we’re investigating the issue and hope to have an answer by Saturday

Another thing, when a coin have a profitability spike prohashing just disable it in order to not paid this spike, im talking about Verge

So I swapped my miners over to good ol slush pool and sure enough ive earned $17 in less then $24 with the same exact miners that were only making me $11 over here in 24 hours.... Honestly this feels like a shady pool and theft.

flnvaz wrote: hello everyone. I am newer to prohash but not new to mining and after running for a month I was able to determine that my payouts/earnings were roughly 50% less than what they should have been. In order to see this bug you can go to tool, pretend your setting up a new miner and use something you can easily reference such as an antMiner S17+ 73TH/s miner. When you enter all of the information to get your miner online prohash only shows that the miner will earn an Estimated Overall revenue, excluding electric is $3.81 however all of the mining calculator out there clearly show an earning of $9.57 per day in revenue. This is based on nothing other than block difficultties and hashing power. The difference from $3.81 to $9.57 is a crazy spread of more than 50%. Has anyone else noticed this issue? At first I thought maybe it was justt the calculator glitching but then I checked my earnings on 55TH/s of power combibed with 150GH/s of X11 power and I have never made more than $11 in a day. That math is incredibly wrong and it most certainly is not a 2% fee. What gives?

I notice this before, This pool is paying much less than they adviced on live profitability section

hello, I just order 4 antminers, they will be here saturday

hello everyone. I am newer to prohash but not new to mining and after running for a month I was able to determine that my payouts/earnings were roughly 50% less than what they should have been. In order to see this bug you can go to tool, pretend your setting up a new miner and use something you can easily reference such as an antMiner S17+ 73TH/s miner. When you enter all of the information to get your miner online prohash only shows that the miner will earn an Estimated Overall revenue, excluding electric is $3.81 however all of the mining calculator out there clearly show an earning of $9.57 per day in revenue. This is based on nothing other than block difficultties and hashing power. The difference from $3.81 to $9.57 is a crazy spread of more than 50%. Has anyone else noticed this issue? At first I thought maybe it was justt the calculator glitching but then I checked my earnings on 55TH/s of power combibed with 150GH/s of X11 power and I have never made more than $11 in a day. That math is incredibly wrong and it most certainly is not a 2% fee. What gives?

bugs

What is the issue with Graviex? Is it temporary?

dnprod wrote:

creader wrote:

dnprod wrote: has started a new topic: three january 2020 ethereum hardforks...

was this not 2019

and 2020 ethereum is fond of forks. this weekend actually.

bitflyer is convinced a fork is happening around this weekend, but i see that link i posted, even though last written in december, talks about 2019. typo? or not? hmmmm

creader wrote:

dnprod wrote: has started a new topic: three january 2020 ethereum hardforks...

was this not 2019

and 2020 ethereum is fond of forks. this weekend actually.