Chat archive · 2017-09

hashingpro · · #25396

unless 2 coins have the same profit/payout which I guess could happen depending on the decimal points and how fast they change.

gestalt · · #25397

So prohashing averages the profits from all the coins it is mining an splits the profit even if you don’t actually get assigned the most profitable coin?

hashingpro · · #25398

no you get what you mine

hashingpro · · #25399

this hour you may get the best coin and I get 2nd best

gestalt · · #25400

Ahh. Ok thats what I wanted to know.

hashingpro · · #25401

net hour I may be on the best and you on 3rd best

hashingpro · · #25402

but over the corse of the day, both of us will have close to what the expected 1MH daily payment says we should have

gestalt · · #25403

Makes sense, so if you can set static coin to the most profitable one, you make more?

hashingpro · · #25404

yes

hashingpro · · #25405

if you can find the best coin to mine and stay there all day you can max your profits

gestalt · · #25406

Ok. Cool. I think I might work on a way to do that.

gestalt · · #25407

Although I heard he is limiting static coin assignment too

hashingpro · · #25408

but if you stay there all day, good chance it will only go up while others move down and get lower and overtake it as best to mine for now...

hashingpro · · #25409

not sure how

hashingpro · · #25410

or why

hashingpro · · #25411

limiting static.....

hashingpro · · #25412

so going to axe solo mining?

hashingpro · · #25413

seems like shooting your profits in the foot

gestalt · · #25414

hashingpro · · #25415

yeah i havent caught up on the past 12 hours of message forums yet

gestalt · · #25416

Maybe I’m not interpreting that correctly. Maybe only limiting dynamic

gestalt · · #25417

It sound like he is going to limit both static and dynamic now though

gestalt · · #25418

Not sure on solo. That probably falls under static.

gestalt · · #25419

Do you happen to know if he runs off the shelf daemons for each coin or if he has a custom p2p solution?

Brandonloves2fly · · #25420

with profits so low, now may be a good time to experiment with static coin assignment. Any coin recommendations? :D

gestalt · · #25421

Its difficult to choose only one because it changes so much. The econ data on the front page isn’t loading for me at the moment, but that would normally be a good place to see what’s good at the time. Its probably a good idea to keep on it and change it frequently.

gestalt · · #25422

I haven’t actually experimented with it yet though.

hashingpro · · #25423

and thats why the auto switching pool was born

hashingpro · · #25424

let the pool pick the best coin at the time to mine

Brandonloves2fly · · #25425

as long as it’s averaging .07 per hash vs .035 to .05 that we are currently getting, I’m a happy camper!

hashingpro · · #25426

ROFL

hashingpro · · #25427

Id not expect to see over .05 again tbh

hashingpro · · #25428

if its at .02 or .01 by end of the year dont be shocked

gestalt · · #25429

I need to start short selling crypto when I buy a miner. Its a sure sign the market is going to crash.

Brandonloves2fly · · #25430

It would be nice to have a dynamic auto switch for 5 to 10 coins of our choice instead of all or single coin static.

hashingpro · · #25431

you and everyone else with orders in not being delivered until november

gestalt · · #25432

It would be nice if this pool would direct hash to nicehash when it’s paying better than the current coins.

gestalt · · #25433

I suppose you have to worry about loops then though.

gestalt · · #25434

Prohash points to NiceHash points to Prohash points to NiceHash... ect.

hashingpro · · #25435

why would mcdonals send you to burger king just cause they are out of food for you to eat?

gestalt · · #25436

They would still get 5% of a larger number though...

hashingpro · · #25437

you know they would stick you with the fish you didnt order at the drive through.

Skarda · · #25438

More info on the a4+. Looks like it could end up being closer to $3000 (see link) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1251930.320

hashingpro · · #25439

@gestalt but why would you pay 10% the 5% from each pool, instead of just jumping on that pool and saving 5%?

gestalt · · #25440

Good point, but prohash has uptodate profitability info that is hard to get otherwise and can switch quickly. That is hard to replicate.

hashingpro · · #25441

@skarda if you already paid for one they you have to pay more to get this one. If you didnt preorder the old one they you have to pay this ones full price.

hashingpro · · #25442

up to date profitibility....nope

gestalt · · #25443

How do you mean?

hashingpro · · #25444

that live profitibility is about worthless

gestalt · · #25445

You mean from the API?

hashingpro · · #25446

unless they had a running total of what my payout is for this 24 hours, or what it was the past 24 hours starting now...then the up to date profits are just flashy numbers with no values

hashingpro · · #25447

on the main charts page

gestalt · · #25448

Internally, I think they have better data though. They should be able to get difficulty number from each node they are running with low lag.

Skarda · · #25449

I was only thinking of odering the a4+. I actually have 10 L3s in the bitmain cue waiting for a wire transfer, and was deciding if i wanted to go through with it or get the a4, but based on that discussion, I think I’ll stay with my L3 order

gestalt · · #25450

L3+ seems like the better value

hashingpro · · #25451

when you look at it now, you see 8.0 and think WOW im going to be making 8 cents per MH. but what you arent seeing is the 5 hours at night when it was only .1 while you were sleeping, or .005 the other 4 hours you were not looking.

gestalt · · #25452

I wonder about this one too though: https://www.ehsminer.com/product/asic-s ... -1024-mhs/

hashingpro · · #25453

so unless that 8.0 bar was a running totoal of the expected 1MH for the day, its just a flashy pretty number

hashingpro · · #25454

what the live value is for right now, has no impact on anythign except as part of the average over the day/past 24 hour period

hashingpro · · #25455

if they kept running total of auto switching payout for the day

hashingpro · · #25456

and could divide by the hashing power they had on auto switching for that same time period. they could display a running total

hashingpro · · #25457

of expected payout per MH then people could compare NH and PH at times to see which pays better.

hashingpro · · #25458

must be a lower priority to calculate the 1MH expected payouts, the total miner earnings pop up at midnight

hashingpro · · #25459

the 1MH expected dont show before 4 am normally

hashingpro · · #25460

or 2 AM i forget

gestalt · · #25461

I wrote a program that compares NH, PH, and ZP over time based on the profitability number each reports. Lots of peaks on all, but NH seems to be a little more stable than PH and ZP and not dip as much. Doesnt have as high of peaks though either. It would just be nice to truncate the dips if they could point the hashing power to NH when those occur.

hashingpro · · #25462

so how do you compare them? at 5PM?

gestalt · · #25463

Every 30 sec

hashingpro · · #25464

NH if I click on the sell my hash has diff numbers at diff times of the day

hashingpro · · #25465

PH has 1MH expected payouts 1 time per day

hashingpro · · #25466

and you cant go by the live profits on the chart

hashingpro · · #25467

for PH they change from 5 to .1 over 30 secs

gestalt · · #25468

The API data updates quickly

hashingpro · · #25469

ahh it compares the data, cant really act on any of it

hashingpro · · #25470

cant switch miners based on that info

gestalt · · #25471

You can, its just difficult.

gestalt · · #25472

And you might lose more switching than you gain

hashingpro · · #25473

i think every 30 secs you would be pool hopping back and forth and never get any hash to go through

gestalt · · #25474

Yeah maybe.

gestalt · · #25475

Thats essentially what PH does though. Just not with pools

hashingpro · · #25476

manually change pools 1 and 2 on a L3+ and click apply, tell me how long to connect on the new pool and start hashing up at 500

gestalt · · #25477

Its about 1 min

gestalt · · #25478

But you can switch much faster using other methods. Probably 1 sec

hashingpro · · #25479

so if you pool hop every other check....no hashing ever

hashingpro · · #25480

just constant restarting

gestalt · · #25481

Look at the restart delay stat on your coins. Thats how fast it can really change if you can do it right.

hashingpro · · #25482

it still has to handshake, authenticate, get the data to begin and get up to speed

hashingpro · · #25483

within the same pool I agree

hashingpro · · #25484

starting a new connection to a new site that doesnt know you from adam...i give it 1 minute to start

gestalt · · #25485

You could keep an open connection to multiple pools and redirect the hash as appropriate.

gestalt · · #25486

Not easy, but not impossible.

hashingpro · · #25487

controller proxy

gestalt · · #25488

Yeah

gestalt · · #25489

I think the delay in the profitability data might ruin it though.

gestalt · · #25490

But prohashing could use their internal data to do it with low lag I think.

hashingpro · · #25491

I dont think a good business model is using or stealing or sharing with the competition as a way to increase your profits

hashingpro · · #25492

its to make your product so much better that they are trying to do that from you.

gestalt · · #25493

Yeah, but they would have to add hash power market place to do what NH does

gestalt · · #25494

That would probably be a distraction from what they offer

hashingpro · · #25495

IF you had more than 3 machines, point 1 at NH, point 1 at PH, point the rest at URL X.