Chat archive · 2017-04
galixxx · Mon Apr 17, 2017 06:37 PM UTC · #1877
jinxorbit wrote: Pool reject rates staying below 2%, Hash rates look good. thx
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 06:46 PM UTC · #1878
I see 3.27 cents for x11, not 1.71
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 06:47 PM UTC · #1879
we are going to restart again soon because we fixed another stability issue that was causing a few rejects - I think there is just that one and one more
galixxx · Mon Apr 17, 2017 06:56 PM UTC · #1880
is prohashing.com down? can’t access the website...
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:00 PM UTC · #1881
yes he say go reboot 10 min ago
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:11 PM UTC · #1882
why scryp Scrypt: 4.32¢. if Litecoin Price 12.05 USD. ....
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:12 PM UTC · #1883
it turns out the server ran out of disk space
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:12 PM UTC · #1884
it has nothing to do with this - debian downloads automatic updates and doesn’t install them, and runs out of space
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:13 PM UTC · #1885
he’ll have it back online as soon as he gives the virtual machine more disk space
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:19 PM UTC · #1888
I think there’s one more mining server issue, which may not be a big deal anyway
rs4longhorns · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:22 PM UTC · #1890
Thanks for all the hard work - keep it up!!
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:30 PM UTC · #1891
we determined that the trader is working, and now Chris is certifying that the software the transfers money to our wallets from exchanges works
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:30 PM UTC · #1892
then he will certify the payouts themselves, which is the last step of that part
FRISKIE · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:33 PM UTC · #1893
The mining server is still offline?
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:45 PM UTC · #1895
the statistics are offline because the stats server ran out of disk space and the operating system was corrupted
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:45 PM UTC · #1896
Chris is restoring it from a backup
FRISKIE · Mon Apr 17, 2017 07:55 PM UTC · #1897
Got it, never a dull moment eh?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 08:12 PM UTC · #1898
Can somebody tell me where do i separately see X11 earning?
Forum notification · Mon Apr 17, 2017 08:41 PM UTC · #1899
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 08:41 PM UTC · #1900
avgswsiss wrote: Can somebody tell me where do i separately see X11 earning? There isn’t one yet, but we plan to hire someone to create a separate chart for this purpose on Saturday. For now, both earnings are mixed together.
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:13 PM UTC · #1901
ok thanks. Can i give it another x11 try now? has rejection hashrate for x11 been resolved?
nameisis · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:16 PM UTC · #1902
Just started with Quad works fine. Just balance not getting updated. But i guess it’s in the fix
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:17 PM UTC · #1903
Thanks nameisis: quad you mean quadruple?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:17 PM UTC · #1905
good. am giving it a try solo
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:19 PM UTC · #1906
Chris-Steve: can you update what’s your expectation to get real balances back?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:21 PM UTC · #1907
Chris & Steve: i had three scenarios where i had DASH Block "Lost"- but i just saw in your help what it means for you: Lost: The block was mined successfully, but a bug in the coin daemon prevented the block from being submitted to the coin network.
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:21 PM UTC · #1908
i was solo mining, of course. What does it mean now in my case?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:22 PM UTC · #1909
btw- i’m not sure if i was solo mining or not. so much happened today with switches
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:31 PM UTC · #1911
if everything goes well, this is the last one of the day
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:45 PM UTC · #1913
Chris just came up with a theory about the DASH issue
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:45 PM UTC · #1914
it says "client syncing to network"
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:45 PM UTC · #1915
so we’re going to try to figure out what the problem is there
tmopar · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:47 PM UTC · #1916
anyone getting errors talking about stratum+tcp is unsupported
tmopar · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:48 PM UTC · #1917
lost 3 shares due to stratum disconnect
tmopar · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:49 PM UTC · #1918
0 json stratum auth failed (null)
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:51 PM UTC · #1920
give it a minute to get prices for all the coins
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:51 PM UTC · #1921
Thanks Steve. meantime, i’m trying to figure out how to follow up immature blocks for now, while solo mining, when they are going to be calculated to my balance and how may i follow them up. Any suggestion?
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:52 PM UTC · #1922
they mature after a number of blocks defined by the network
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:52 PM UTC · #1923
usually, it’s a very long time, like 100 or 1000 blocks
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:53 PM UTC · #1924
clear- but how may i follow up- backtrack when they will be synced to my balance?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:53 PM UTC · #1925
yeah- usually there is a confirmations number for each coin that needs to be found by network before allocating.
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:53 PM UTC · #1926
balance not repear? on x11 i stay on pool all day and money not add on my balance-(
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:57 PM UTC · #1927
it looks like this mining server change was successful
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:57 PM UTC · #1928
the only remaining error I’m aware of with it is the DASH synchronization error
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:58 PM UTC · #1929
look at "recent found blocks" and click on history rather than live, on the earnings page, avgswsiss
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:58 PM UTC · #1930
they will say "mature" when they finally mature
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 09:58 PM UTC · #1931
you’ll have to scroll back into the past before you start to see them say that, though
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:01 PM UTC · #1933
would be better to at least be able sort as per status> mature, immature, etc... it’s hard to follow up like this, esp. when you have hundred or thausends of blocks
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:02 PM UTC · #1934
avgswsiss wrote: would be better to at least be able sort as per status> mature, immature, etc... it’s hard to follow up like this, esp. when you have hundred or thausends of blocks Thanks for the suggestion. I’ll add this onto the list. Perhaps I’ll introduce people to the developer on Saturday and you can suggest website features to him directly!
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:03 PM UTC · #1935
menatime i see most of them Mature, especially with x11 where i’m solo mining- but i’m affraid balance does not include yet x11 revenues?!
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:04 PM UTC · #1936
sound good. i think website does definitely need two separated Algo’s sections, while one common as a general overview for both algos.
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:04 PM UTC · #1937
yes.. i am too. many blocks Mature on my stats.
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:05 PM UTC · #1938
for solo need write m=solo ?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:06 PM UTC · #1940
if this is going to stay for longer, X11: 1.99¢ · 0.00001686BTC- is scaryyy
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:11 PM UTC · #1941
Steve- Hashpower i’m delivering isn’t being showed correctly. I was looking at this for last few hours. It is always at least 5 to 10 GH/s lower than i really have.
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:12 PM UTC · #1944
It may stay on DUsh and not do nothing
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:12 PM UTC · #1945
even by rejected showing only 150 - 300 MH/s
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:13 PM UTC · #1946
so for solo i most write ? a=x11 d=1 m=solo . This True?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:16 PM UTC · #1949
but i’m not sure this is best choise!
nameisis · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:20 PM UTC · #1950
got 600Mhash as rated on quad. So no problem for me when i mined
tmopar · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:42 PM UTC · #1952
i am getting a seemingly high number of orphaned blocks solomining are you aware of any issues like that
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:43 PM UTC · #1953
i have switched definitively away x11 until it get’s stable and clear. to confused right now and i think to much power i’m losing- or not being able to follow up what’s being paid for.
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:44 PM UTC · #1954
Stiv say all ok with payment will.
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:45 PM UTC · #1955
i don’t doubt. just need overview and will be back probably as soon as things getting cleared.
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:46 PM UTC · #1956
yes mb . i will return my miners too when will all work
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:03 PM UTC · #1957
avgswsiss wrote: Steve- Hashpower i’m delivering isn’t being showed correctly. I was looking at this for last few hours. It is always at least 5 to 10 GH/s lower than i really have. For which algorithm?
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:07 PM UTC · #1960
avgswsiss wrote: x11 What is your username? It’s not the same as here.
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:09 PM UTC · #1963
avgswsiss wrote: Albxx I see one at 449 - what should it be?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:09 PM UTC · #1964
Steve- now yes, i have switched away. let me reconnect back my 20 GH/s strat.
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:10 PM UTC · #1965
avgswsiss wrote: Steve- now yes, i have switched away. let me reconnect back my 20 GH/s strat. you don’t need to
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:10 PM UTC · #1966
avgswsiss wrote: Steve- now yes, i have switched away. let me reconnect back my 20 GH/s strat. Just tell me what you think the 449 miner should be
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:11 PM UTC · #1967
Steve- this is where i lose power because there are number of my units that i connect over stratum. here currently is correct, because it’s one batch with 3 units = 450
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:11 PM UTC · #1968
avgswsiss wrote: Steve- this is where i lose power because there are number of my units that i connect over stratum. here currently is correct, because it’s one batch with 3 units = 450 Do you connect them all in one connection?
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:14 PM UTC · #1970
avgswsiss wrote: yes, in one stratum Which coin were they assigned to? Did they end up on DASH?
avgswsiss · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:19 PM UTC · #1971
i did not assing to any specific coin. yes, it ended up on DASH where i had 2-3 Lost notifications earllier.
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:21 PM UTC · #1973
avgswsiss wrote: i did not assing to any specific coin. yes, it ended up on DASH where i had 2-3 Lost notifications earllier. hmmm, that still shouldn’t explain the low hashrate
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:21 PM UTC · #1974
avgswsiss wrote: i did not assing to any specific coin. yes, it ended up on DASH where i had 2-3 Lost notifications earllier. is this a rental service? or, do you have the physical miners that don't go through a proxy?
crazyq3 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:22 PM UTC · #1975
i coin assigned to 90 % bitcoin and 10 % dush . My balance 0. was 2 Giant 900 mh/s 2-3 hours on pool
Steve Sokolowski · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:23 PM UTC · #1976
crazyq3 wrote: i coin assigned to 90 % bitcoin and 10 % dush . My balance 0. was 2 Giant 900 mh/s 2-3 hours on pool this was m=solo with x11?