Rejected Share Reasons

steve, not sure if you didn't read the topic starting question, or you don't understand the question..

He (we) aren't referencing STALE....he (we) are in reference to INCORRECT ALGORITHM

I'm still surprised about the doubt around commitment to invest in infrastructure. Surely the numbers add up to get more hardware??

Steve stop ignoring the original question.

It may sound silly, but is it possible to migrate server to Amazon cloud?

So it charges more when the server needs more computing, resources on the fly?

BalloonTree wrote:It may sound silly, but is it possible to migrate server to Amazon cloud?

So it charges more when the server needs more computing, resources on the fly?

The system is limited by CPU usage, so purchasing hardware won't resolve the problem.

We continue to develop the software by parallelizing every part of it, but it will likely be 6 months before everything is completely parallelized, even if we do decide to increase investment.

-_-

Well I will be seeing you guys in about 6 months...until then farewell...nicehash here I come... ( ○ _ ○)... Im sure you hear a lot that this thing you have going has so much potential but I think you guys are letting your conservative descions drag you down. Who knows another company or team will develop a site like yours and do things you guys could not do in a timely manner. Take a gamble just like all us miners do.

I am guessing issue isn't resolved as I am getting 8-10% rejected shares on all my miners.

I only have 90% efficiency. I just started to try prohashing after reading from forum, as an addition to nice hash. But this 90% efficiency looks terrible especially that there is no quick fix, but a 6 months waiting is too long. Hope that your team can fix this CPU problem immediately.