GregoryGHarding wrote: americans can travel to cuba, as long as the do so through canadathinking the embargo was lifted, we can travel to cuba directly now
Chat archive · 2018-12
CSZiggy · · #91077
CSZiggy · · #91078
CSZiggy wrote: https://novaexchange.com/terms_and_conditions/ -- 3. ELIGIBILITY -- 3.2. You represent and warrant that you are not located in, under the control of, or a national or resident of the United States.
CSZiggy · · #91079
GregoryGHarding · · #91080
CSZiggy wrote:trump stopped itGregoryGHarding wrote: americans can travel to cuba, as long as the do so through canadathinking the embargo was lifted, we can travel to cuba directly now
GregoryGHarding · · #91081
GregoryGHarding · · #91082
GregoryGHarding · · #91083
GregoryGHarding · · #91084
CSZiggy · · #91085
GregoryGHarding wrote:Americans are not banned from traveling to Cuba. Americans just can’t go to Cuba for tourism. - https://www.viahero.com/travel-to-cuba/ ... el-to-cubaCSZiggy wrote:trump stopped itGregoryGHarding wrote: americans can travel to cuba, as long as the do so through canadathinking the embargo was lifted, we can travel to cuba directly now
GregoryGHarding · · #91086
GregoryGHarding · · #91087
CSZiggy · · #91088
Zimon314 · · #91090
GregoryGHarding · · #91091
CSZiggy · · #91092
citronick · · #91094
RCMco · · #91095
CSZiggy · · #91096
citronick wrote: @steve .... is the current ranking order of algos listed on this page realtime based on profitability?if you reload the page 5 times you may notice the order changes randomly, so i would guess not
CSZiggy · · #91097
CSZiggy · · #91098
citronick · · #91099
Steve Sokolowski · · #91100
CSZiggy wrote:There isn’t any order to the datacitronick wrote: @steve .... is the current ranking order of algos listed on this page realtime based on profitability?if you reload the page 5 times you may notice the order changes randomly, so i would guess not
citronick · · #91102
Steve Sokolowski · · #91103
citronick wrote: Bitmain E3 compatible with Prohashing port 3339 ?Yep, that was fixed
citronick · · #91104
citronick · · #91105
citronick · · #91106
CSZiggy · · #91107
bayudness · · #91108
bayudness · · #91109
Steve Sokolowski · · #91110
bayudness wrote: any chance of getting Etherium fixed? its been off all nightCould you submit a support ticket? I’ll assign it to Chris and he’ll get on it right away
alim · · #91111
olkah · · #91112
Steve Sokolowski · · #91113
olkah wrote: @ Steve Sokolowski why don’t you add the original CNWe don’t have enough manpower to do that right now; we still have all the exx coins to add on the existing algorithms before that
citronick · · #91115
hobospices · · #91116
hobospices · · #91117
citronick wrote: anyone got the E3 to work?I’ll let you know if I find out anything
Steve Sokolowski · · #91118
hobospices wrote: { @citronick « Fri 6:00 pm » anyone got the E3 to work?] I’m in the same boat, I’ve got a ticket in but their are some other priorities they need to get to first...Vance needs to fix a problem with ERC20 payouts first
Steve Sokolowski · · #91119
citronick · · #91121
dragonbyte_llc · · #91122
dragonbyte_llc · · #91123
dragonbyte_llc · · #91124
citronick · · #91125
hobospices wrote:tried putting it via MRR proxy but still nadacitronick wrote: anyone got the E3 to work?I’ll let you know if I find out anything
suykast · · #91126
suykast · · #91127
mayster 25 · · #91128
Steve Sokolowski · · #91129
suykast wrote: pool deadThis was the maintenence that was discussed in the "News" forum - it’s been completed now
Splinter · · #91132
Simon_says · · #91133
Steve Sokolowski · · #91134
Splinter wrote: Why are 0x payments delayed for 4 days?There’s a problem with ERC-20 token payouts that was resolved - the decimal point was in the wrong place
Steve Sokolowski · · #91135
Steve Sokolowski · · #91136
Simon_says · · #91137
keksik · · #91138
alim · · #91139
Simon_says · · #91140
alim wrote: @ Simon_says - Not yet - the CN implementation was delayed. I know many of us are waiting. In the meantime, checkminingpoolstats.stream for the pool - fairhash as a useful view of profitability for all the CN variations. Obviously CN is not as profitable as the v8 / hash, but it is still more profitable than my sha, scrypt, sia, or x11 miners.Thanks for your very informative answer alim, really appreciate it.
hobospices · · #91142
Simon_says wrote: @ Steve Sokolowski Is this CN here compatible with bitmain’s X3 ???I think CN implementation is still a ways away. They implemented CNv8 a month ago but still need to work on making some actual coins available to mine.
Simon_says · · #91143
hobospices wrote:Hobospices, interesting your analisis. Thanks for clarify those technicals aspectsSimon_says wrote: @ Steve Sokolowski Is this CN here compatible with bitmain’s X3 ???I think CN implementation is still a ways away. They implemented CNv8 a month ago but still need to work on making some actual coins available to mine.
mickeekung · · #91144
citronick · · #91147
Steve Sokolowski · · #91149
citronick wrote: Steve - any updates on guides for E3 to workThe E3s are now enabled and ready for use
Steve Sokolowski · · #91150
citronick · · #91154
Steve Sokolowski · · #91155
citronick wrote: steve -- on E3 setup - is there a guide in Help section?The setup should be the same as it is for a different ethash miner
citronick · · #91158
Steve Sokolowski wrote:.... and where would this section be in Help for "a different ethash miner" ?citronick wrote: steve -- on E3 setup - is there a guide in Help section?The setup should be the same as it is for a different ethash miner
Steve Sokolowski · · #91159
citronick wrote:By "different," we mean any average miner - use the same setupSteve Sokolowski wrote:.... and where would this section be in Help for "a different ethash miner" ?citronick wrote: steve -- on E3 setup - is there a guide in Help section?The setup should be the same as it is for a different ethash miner
citronick · · #91160
Steve Sokolowski wrote:with eth usual parameters... the E3 is shown alive poolside but not hashing and not accepting any hash. Anyone has success with E3 ?citronick wrote:By "different," we mean any average miner - use the same setupSteve Sokolowski wrote: The setup should be the same as it is for a different ethash miner.... and where would this section be in Help for "a different ethash miner" ?
Steve Sokolowski · · #91162
Steve Sokolowski · · #91163
hobospices · · #91165
citronick wrote:I can get it to hash with just an n= parameter but it has a very high level of reject. I tried c= parameter but it will not connect when i used it. If c= parameter did work wouldnt it just be more profitable to mine on a dedicated pool?Steve Sokolowski wrote:with eth usual parameters... the E3 is shown alive poolside but not hashing and not accepting any hash. Anyone has success with E3 ?citronick wrote: .... and where would this section be in Help for "a different ethash miner" ?By "different," we mean any average miner - use the same setup
olkah · · #91168
olkah · · #91169
GregoryGHarding · · #91170
GregoryGHarding · · #91171
Steve Sokolowski · · #91172
GregoryGHarding wrote: updateNo. The latest version has had a change that is incompatible with our existing code, so we disabled the coin until we can figure out what they changed after the holidays
PolakCrypto · · #91175
Steve Sokolowski · · #91176
PolakCrypto wrote: why cant we see what coin we are mining anymore during auto-switch for most profitable?Could you be more specific? The "live coin status" boxes still display the list of coins that are mineable and how many customers are mining them, as far as I’m aware
JonSmith · · #91177
PolakCrypto · · #91179
Steve Sokolowski wrote:PolakCrypto wrote: why cant we see what coin we are mining anymore during auto-switch for most profitable?Could you be more specific? The "live coin status" boxes still display the list of coins that are mineable and how many customers are mining them, as far as I’m aware
PolakCrypto · · #91180
PolakCrypto · · #91181