Read-only forum archive. PROHASHING has closed. Posting, registration, and account access are unavailable. Preserved from the April 3, 2026 server backup.
yea just going to have to wait it out, wish I had canceled my NH order around 1 when I was up and I knew it, now will just wait til the dust settles and see what I am left with.
whenever the server catches up. payouts script is set to run in a half hour so they might even get delayed further, but its only viewing of stats effected your miner and shares are still counted, you will not lose any money
does anyone know when accounts will be broughup to current, i really dont want to mine if i cant tell what i am earning..
Yes, I've been waiting entirely too long myself to get some kind of update from Chris - @Chris & Steve - you guys do realize this concerns people's money don't you? If you've simply cocked it up and lost the shares from yesterday we need to know!
no worries. if you beleive your stats are incorrect once server catches up you can contact chris or steve and they will manually check to make sure you arent missing shares
Improvement is one thing, I want to be credited for my lost profits though, and that's entirely another topic - and absolute radio silence from the team regarding lost profits from yesterday is yet another topic.
friskie you missed my message below about manual adjustments
I responded that I have 2 messages in to Chris about lost profits/shares since early yesterday, and I haven't so much as seen him online in at least a 24 hour period, let alone received any response to my queries.
I dont really think the delay is the problem I have been graphing my orders all day and the balance is not increasing anymore and I can clearly mark when things went wrong with increasing data delay until the server reboot things started back on track then when they got out of hand on delays again right back in the hole
friskie you missed my message below about manual adjustments
I responded that I have 2 messages in to Chris about lost profits/shares since early yesterday, and I haven't so much as seen him online in at least a 24 hour period, let alone received any response to my queries.
In the next release, I'm going to look into figuring out a way to prevent connections from IP addresses who have never connected to the pool before, or to allow only a certain number of new connections. Hopefully this limitation will improve the experience for customers. Meanwhile, mining continues normally, as the system is designed to prioritize mining above all other functions when resources are limited. The database is currently backed up 27GB of share data. It will take a while to catch up, and if the database-operator crashes, mining will continue but Chris will have to make manual corrections himself.
My 2 cents on that obviously it’s good it’s making profit but over the past week generally prices have been favourable. I wonder what that graph looks like once the prices flatten for a while.
This statement is a bit misleading, if not outright untrue "Ethereum’s sole use case at the moment is ICOs and token creation." - that he states this early in the article it sets a distorted "spin" on everything that follows. There are a large number of Ethereum projects out there which have moved well beyond the ICO stage to have real products in at least a testing phase, with several in various stages of production lifecycle. For an idea of some of the "disruptive potential" of what WhalePanda (almost derisively) sees as only use case being ICOs, have a look at this quick article which discusses some of the interesting current projects - https://disruptordaily.com/top-10-disru ... -projects/ - I personally go on record as categorically disagreeing with WhalePanda's views that the price rise in Ethereum is solely due to "greed, speculation and profit seekers" - while there is certainly this element to the price rise (isn't there always?) , there is also a growing number of BTC holders hedging against a potential collapse in BTC valuation (transaction times/cost, scaling issues, community can't agree etc.) and others who embrace the technology in growing numbers, as more people begin to educate themselves beyond Bitcoin. Am sad to see that article, as I often agree with WhalePanda, but this time he's more wrong than right, and I'm left wondering if there isn't an ulterior motive for such a clearly biased article.
@ piet - good catch mate - have you alerted their support team just in case? Highly suspicious to see that many transactions in a short timespan to the same address!