Read-only forum archive. PROHASHING has closed. Posting, registration, and account access are unavailable. Preserved from the April 3, 2026 server backup.
Look at the payout numbers and chart on the Charts page. The efficiency number you are refering too has no direct relationship to profits because it does not factor in the coin you're mining or it's profitability.
Average mining efficiency <--- FROM the Help page.
Your average mining efficiency for the past two hours. Mining efficiency is the percentage of shares that are accepted divided by the total number of shares submitted. Rejected shares will decrease mining efficiency. Since it is impossible to completely eliminate rejected shares, a mining efficiency of 98% or greater is considered excellent. Lower efficiencies can be caused by bugs in your mining software, hardware errors in your miner, and high latency with the Prohashing server.
The figure displayed in this box are averaged over a longer period of time and are useful for determining the medium-term performance of mining equipment. The "worker status" table represents a more accurate snapshot of what is happening right now with each miner.
Also from: Status as of Saturday, September 9, 2017 There were issues with share insertion yesterday. I know how to fix them but the problem is of low priority at the moment. There are also issues with live profitability numbers, which are of low priority behind the performance issues. Chris credited yesterday's surpluses to all miners, so the paid profits are higher than those reported in the charts.
Minerman wrote:Ok, so it is just 90 percent worse... than litecoinmining at 103 percent?
PH has to do 113 percent better than litecoinpool ?
Why don´t you try litecoinpool for a day and let us know what happend the day after? I can tell you by practical experience, PH is doing +/- 20% better.
