Kawpow
- Rivve

- Archived posts: 6
- Joined: May 31, 2021
- vit_lab
- Archived posts: 7
- Joined: May 28, 2021
Re: Kawpow
It is bad and sad !!!
- Marduke
- Archived posts: 11
- Joined: Jun 01, 2021
Re: Kawpow
Too bad to see that. I would have been greatly interested in Kawpow/Ravencoin.
Look how well the RandomX is going. Seems to always have 700-800 miners assigned. That's not counting the ones that don't show up.
Who knows, maybe we'll get lucky and they will reconsider.
Look how well the RandomX is going. Seems to always have 700-800 miners assigned. That's not counting the ones that don't show up.
Who knows, maybe we'll get lucky and they will reconsider.
- vit_lab
- Archived posts: 7
- Joined: May 28, 2021
Re: Kawpow
Marduke wrote: Too bad to see that. I would have been greatly interested in Kawpow/Ravencoin.Admins are silent (((
Look how well the RandomX is going. Seems to always have 700-800 miners assigned. That's not counting the ones that don't show up.
Who knows, maybe we'll get lucky and they will reconsider.
- Steve Sokolowski

- Archived posts: 4559
- Joined: Aug 27, 2014
Re: Kawpow
I'd love to add Kawpow, but there's only so many things we can do at a time. If we add it, we would not be able to add Chia mining for a while. Don't worry; this is on the list.
- Marduke
- Archived posts: 11
- Joined: Jun 01, 2021
Re: Kawpow
Well..... Looks like according to the recent poll that 'most' of the people that responded did NOT want chia mining implemented.
so, maybe (please, please) you could work on implementing KawPow instead?
Steve, appreciate that you take the time to respond and that your responses are so candid. Keep up the good work!
so, maybe (please, please) you could work on implementing KawPow instead?
Steve, appreciate that you take the time to respond and that your responses are so candid. Keep up the good work!