Prohashing -v- LitecoinPool

EyePeaSea
Archived posts: 38
Joined: Nov 23, 2017

Prohashing -v- LitecoinPool

by EyePeaSea · · Post #14734

I've read some, almost angry, comments from people moaning about PH and the pool fee (on forums, twitter etc.). Usually someone else makes the point about the PPShare and the benefits of mining the best coin at any given time, etc.

But I thought I'd put it to a test. Over the last 7 days, I ran one L3+ against PH and the other against LitecoinPool. PH was generating about 3% more until I had some disconnects, but ended up generating just over 1% more than LitecoinPool. For me (and I know this is personal), the flexibility in terms of payout coins on PH is very useful, so even without the slightly higher payout, it would still be a favourite for me. And if I wasn't incredibly unlucky with (I'm assuming) a disconnect during the Verge block find, then the return from PH would have been higher still.

Anyway, it's depressing how some people either deliberately or accidentally, rubbish one thing (e.g. PH) without actually trying it out.

For some balance, I've found LitecoinPool to be absolutely rock solid - I think I've had one disconnect in 7 days. With PH, there have been more connectivity issues but for me, it's the payout that's important.

So - thanks PH for the good service - I hope we jointly continue to make money together :D

Incidentally - another little (off-topic) test. I've just offered a buyer on eBay the option of paying in Litecoin or Gulden. Given them a 5% discount over the price as I won't be paying the PayPal charges. It'll be interesting to see if they go for it. At the moment, it's obviously a minority of people who are happy / able to use Crypto, but I think it's worth offering this as an option.
EyePeaSea
Archived posts: 38
Joined: Nov 23, 2017

Re: Prohashing -v- LitecoinPool

by EyePeaSea · · Post #14736

I appreciate what you're saying, but calculators don't take in account things like disconnect, stale blocks caused by infrastructure issues etc. I know 7 days isn't a long period, but for me, it's more "real world" than just relying on a calculator.

And no, the 1% improvement over LiteCoinPool was *without* the Verge payout (I'm still a bit miffed about that :-( ) - but it's no ones fault, I guess I was just unlucky to be disconnected or something.
EyePeaSea
Archived posts: 38
Joined: Nov 23, 2017

Re: Prohashing -v- LitecoinPool

by EyePeaSea · · Post #14742

That's interesting - how different from my results? Was LCP better for you by a lot or just a couple of %? By the nature of switching coins, I'm guessing that PH algo will sometimes make poor choices, so I'm not saying it's perfect, just that for my trial, it seemed better. But it is a very close thing.

I presume that the coin selection algo that PH have written will improve over time (particularly as they recruit staff and have more bandwidth to work on the core systems).

If your testing shows LCP to be *much* better, then I'm truly puzzled...
EyePeaSea
Archived posts: 38
Joined: Nov 23, 2017

Re: Prohashing -v- LitecoinPool

by EyePeaSea · · Post #14763

My question was "...how different from my results?". I was merely asking out of curiosity as that information may be useful to others, including myself. From your reply, you say 3 - 5%, so I'll take it that is what you've found.

Yes, I agree, a small percentage improvement will be more financially significant, the more mining you do. Whether x% is financially significant to you is your business. I wasn't asking about that and I'm really not interested in your personal finances.

If another pool is performing better then it's interesting information for both miners and the team at PH. I posted my actual results, so it's useful to validate or contradict those results with other information.