" 1 error" message

poppy01
Archived posts: 8
Joined: Jul 29, 2017

Re: " 1 error" message

by poppy01 · · Post #9964

hashingpro wrote:https://forums.prohashing.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2099

Maybe this will shed some light on what happened recently.

Not really, sorry.
According to my own tests my miners always have been disconnected properly in case I switched to another pool manually, so this cannot be the problem here. As per my opinion, this problem is caused by a misinterpretation of the password string by the new release.
This problem should be fixed since there is no chance - in case you are running several miners - to identify a non-performing miner by these cryptic ID strings.

Interestingly, I saw a strange behaviour just a few minutes ago. The amount of my connected miners was 22 (I have only 12) and the total hash power was greater than 10 GHS - which should be 6GHS max. Both counters came down to the correct values after a few seconds and remain there since then. However, this issue should be investigated as well.

Update: Currently 11 of my 12 miners show cryptic worker names. The hash rates seem to be ok.


BR
poppy01
poppy01
Archived posts: 8
Joined: Jul 29, 2017

Re: " 1 error" message

by poppy01 · · Post #9967

What are you talking about???
I posted my names here earlier, and as you can see they are clearly different! A difference of one character makes it a different name, am I right?
On the help page there is also no hint about any forbidden characters that I used. And: it worked perfectly well before!

I guess neither you nor me can be aware of any changes made to the password string. Maybe Chris should enlighten us here....
hashingpro
Archived posts: 188
Joined: Aug 18, 2017

Re: " 1 error" message

by hashingpro · · Post #10021

poppy01 wrote:What are you talking about???
I posted my names here earlier, and as you can see they are clearly different! A difference of one character makes it a different name, am I right?
On the help page there is also no hint about any forbidden characters that I used. And: it worked perfectly well before!

I guess neither you nor me can be aware of any changes made to the password string. Maybe Chris should enlighten us here....

My password string is:
n=Antminer_L3_01
n=Antminer_L3_02


They recently made changes to worker names.
What if, and I didn't test it, they ignore from the underscore on down.
Then ALL your worker names to the pool are the same. Yes you are changing them, but only if the _ wasnt an illegal character and got parsed out?
if so you have all your miners named, at least to the pool, Antminer

All I was asking is, did you try M1, M2, M3...LOSE the underscore to see if that mattered?