vinylwasp wrote:Steve Sokolowski wrote:
I don't think these people have any purpose at all, and they're actually pretty dumb. Would you:
1. Spend your own money
2. Not be able to get anything in return because you can't steal any money or hack any systems
3. Provide more evidence for us to add to the police reports so that you can live in fear of arrest
That doesn't seem to be very smart to me. If I were to do something like this, I would at least want to have some potential for gain in exchange for my money and the chance of spending years in prison.
If they're another Pool operator that directly benefits from PH being down, then there's a strong economic motivation to keep DDoSing.
If they do it for long enough their strategy may be to cause you sufficient loss of revenue and cost to remediate to ultimately drive you out of business. I hope this doesn't happen of course but there are plenty of precedents for competitor DDoS attacks.
DDoS attacks are actually pretty cheap. Just google "web site stressor" and you'll find services (sic) for a few bucks per hour.
Javapipe sounds promising, my only concern would be increased latency, but we'll just have to wait and see what the impact of that might be.
One of the interesting parts here that I'll write about in a post later is that there's a difference between us and places like NiceHash.
I'm told these attacks are pretty common, so once in four years is a pretty low frequency to be attacked. I suspect that part of the reason is that these other pools that don't publish their real identities and have no phone number or E-Mail address have no legal recourse. Many of them are probably committing tax fraud, so they can't go to the police to take action against attackers.
On the other hand, because we do pay our taxes, we can involve the police. These attacks pushed the total damages over $10,000, which means that the FBI will now take a report. I'm going to task Chris next weekend with filing a report with the FBI so that this is on record with them. I would assume that such a small amount of money is not enough for them to care about us, but when other sites are attacked, this does allow a "correlation attack" against the perpetrator that could allow evidence to be gathered. For example, they may be perfectly secure in not revealing their source IPs during this attack, but it could be found that one of these IPs logged into some other site they are investigating and leaked information there, and they didn't know what the information meant until they had the context that they wanted to try to get into a mining pool.
After we've fixed this, we need to make it clear that we don't fool around with criminal activity. Even if no arrests are made, the criminals know that the stakes are higher because cops will be looking for them when they attack us. When they attack NiceHash, they know the cops aren't after them because NiceHash isn't willing to reveal who actually owns the site. This is probably what has for four years, and should in the future, encourage criminals to attack other sites instead.