Read-only forum archive. PROHASHING has closed. Posting, registration, and account access are unavailable. Preserved from the April 3, 2026 server backup.
@olkah : not that impressed really. I doubt the power of the facebook much less its coin. That’s the same company that tried to push VR right? How did that work out?
using a blockchain to validate users on an app might be fine. Charging people a crypto coin to post on their site is interesting, 1000 posts for $1 might generate more revenue, or send everyone away to a free service.
What’s the difference between vanilla Equihash and 144,5 ? Is it configuration only, or is the variation ASIC-resistant? (I.e. Will it work on a Z9-mini?)
S3KshuN8 wrote: What’s the difference between vanilla Equihash and 144,5 ? Is it configuration only, or is the variation ASIC-resistant? (I.e. Will it work on a Z9-mini?)
Bitcoin Gold forked to that algorithm because they believed it would delay the time until ASICs were used to mine bitcoin gold
@Steve Sokolowski : </strong> Yesterday’s pool payout jumped from 26K up to 42K, was there another payout error related to a few miners that didn’t get corrected to jump it up again or was there a mistake in the correction or ????
CSZiggy wrote: @Steve Sokolowski : </strong> Yesterday’s pool payout jumped from 26K up to 42K, was there another payout error related to a few miners that didn’t get corrected to jump it up again or was there a mistake in the correction or ????
there were two separate errors, I’ll review them in a post
when will 144_5 mining on prohashing work with Gminer? theres no possible way to use it since you require --pers string to be absent from mining.bat/config
PolakCrypto wrote: when will 144_5 mining on prohashing work with Gminer? theres no possible way to use it since you require --pers string to be absent from mining.bat/config
that looks like an implementation error - we’ll disable the algorithm while the next steps are determined
@steve Sokolowski - Looks like you finally nipped it on 144_5..its working 100% as it should so far. Im on Gminer getting top speed(over EWBF is slower miner) and using --pers Auto
olkah, I deleted a message because you didn’t provide any context for it - feel free to discuss things here but not to just post text without explaning where it is from
Good article from MSN...and why having a money transmission license is so important to that type of business...not that selling land you don’t own would help in that case. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compani ... li=BBnbfcN
Steve Sokolowski wrote: olkah, I deleted a message because you didn’t provide any context for it - feel free to discuss things here but not to just post text without explaning where it is from
I realize that is like a base coin for its algo, but was there a policy about abandoning coins that do forks without enough prior notice to allow changes to be made to then in a realistic time?
The next question I guess, how much $ was being generated by Monero being mined? Is it worth while to keep it minable if the profits the pool gets from mining it have a lower ROI than increasing payouts on SHA-256 or scrypt or X-11? Might increasing payouts on one of the other algos be a better use of pool resources or was Monero that popular/profitable?
CSZiggy wrote: The next question I guess, how much $ was being generated by Monero being mined? Is it worth while to keep it minable if the profits the pool gets from mining it have a lower ROI than increasing payouts on SHA-256 or scrypt or X-11? Might increasing payouts on one of the other algos be a better use of pool resources or was Monero that popular/profitable?
That policy doesn’t apply here because Monero did announce this fork, many months ago
cause i feel its egregious your guys system pays out to put us in the negative then its our fault and we have to "mine" for free to pay off your faulty payout system?
my dad received a $5,000 check from DISCOVER bank on Saturday for a loan he had never taken out; he called them and they agreed to rip up the check - mistakes like that are made all the time, but it doesn’t mean it was his money to keep
@PolakCrypto : I still have 2 coins, that are negative -.0000031 and whatnot that cannot ever be earned again. leaves data on the earnings/settings page you can never get rid of, yep.
@jde : Pretty sure it means they are figuring in a 5% loss of what its valued at on the exchanges due to the average of losing a block here and there due to orphans. They still get 5% of what YOU make. So you get paid 95% of what the exchange rate is, then they get 5% of that.
you would have to ask the pool owners if the selling of 1 coin and the buying of another also incurs the fees on the exchanges to buy-sell instant coins, and then the 5% fee on top of those fees.
jde wrote: I noticed the orphan rates for the three biggest Equihash coins are over 5%. Is that right? Does that mean the pool is losing money with Equihash?
those orphan rates are accounted for when deciding payouts - these coins have very fast block times, and therefore have a lot of orphans
ultiman2 wrote: i just found why i was not able to mine monero, port was changed
Monero changed algorithms, so you need to use the new CryptonightR port - cryptonightv8 will eventually return with whatever coins are still on that algorithm
I have developed a strong belief that the pools added an algorithm on which the usual miner is not what opportunities to make good money and added only fraudulent algorithms such as CryptonightR. And like Cryptonight if and when it will be added then it will be impossible to earn and not because of the coins he has little, and certainly not because they are not on the exchanges.For example https://www.mining-dutch.nl/ when asked, add Cryptonight goes off the defensive as buto didn't hear the question.I believe that it is done deliberately and it seems that there is a conspiracy.
У меня сложилось стойкое убеждение в том что на пулы добавляют алгоритм на котором обычному шахтеру нет не какой возможности хорошо заработать а добавляется исключительно алгоритмы мошеннические такие как CryptonightR. А такой как Cryptonight если и будет когда то добавлен то на нём уже заработать будет невозможно и не потому что монет у него мало и тем более не потому что их нет на биржах.Например https://www.mining-dutch.nl/ при вопросе добавте Cryptonight уходит в глухую оборону как буто не слышыл вопроса.Я так считаю что сделано это умышленно и складывается впечатление что тут есть сговор.
And the more the problem is not how can not be the equipment as for example something for other algorithms of this problem simply does not exist but only exclusively for Cryptonight it is and it leads to certain thoughts.