Chat archive · 2017-07

nattylitecoin · · #13530

10% rejected :(

ru55ian · · #13531

I see profitability is way down in Scrypt too... Too many L3+ out there

Maxumark · · #13532

pilottage wrote: TAX the RICHS heavily... PAY the poor FATLY or your dead POOL will die out of loosing the most clever small miners REDUCE difficulty... its the low diff BLOCS that merge well with others....<100MHS 1% <200MHS 2% <300MHS 3% <400MHS 4% >500MHS 5% <600MHS 6% <700MHS 7% <800MHS 8% <900MHS 9% <1GHS 10% <2GHS 11% <3GHS 12% <4GHs 13% <5GHS 14% 6GHS 15% 7GHS 16% 8GHS 17% 9GHS 18% 10GHS 19% 20GHS 20%...... I bet with this scheme EVERYONE will earn more.... including the owners that is for sure....

Maxumark · · #13533

I am going to try and say this as nicely as possible which is a struggle at the moment. This is not a good idea and will kill the pool.

Maxumark · · #13534

As a decent size hash I have always supported less lucky hash in non profit switching pools. I always found more blocks and coin than I was paid out and the difference was much more than just the pool fees.

Maxumark · · #13535

There have been a bunch of ideas thrown around that are just ideas to treat symptoms as they appear to affect the user themselves while they do not understand that they themselves may be a huge contributor to the problem

Maxumark · · #13536

The current system limitations are not Hashrate even if that is the easy visual guide where we think we see a problem. The system limitation is share processing.

Maxumark · · #13537

The system limitation is share processing! So let me illustrate. If I run one of my 500 MHs L3+ on PH and its current difficulty is 524288 and it is submitting 222 shares over 120 minutes, so about 1.85 shares per minute. If I run a 20 MHs Zues Thunder X6 at a difficulty of 512 when it was allowable I would be submitting about 3,600 shares in 120 minutes or about 30 per minute. So based on share processing system resources 12 L3+s combined use less of the pools capacity than 1 20 MHs Zues miner at a difficulty of 512!

Maxumark · · #13538

This is why a minimum difficulty was put in place and works. The difficulty minimum reduces share submissions and system load.

Maxumark · · #13539

Sorry so long should have went with a forum post. If you REALLY want a FAIR fee structure it should be based on number of shares submitted and that would correlate to the usage of the system resources.

Maxumark · · #13540

If you gained anything from my comments hopefully it is to run your equipment at the highest possible difficulty to allow 1 or 2 shares submitted per minute. Or if the pool is working correctly let the pool determine the optimal difficulty. Rant over.

dronKZ · · #13541

да застрочил ты зачетно)))

dronKZ · · #13542

но поверь БРАТЬЯ работают со своими тараканами)))

Forum notification · · #13543

ekan1975 · · #13544

Prohashing charges a mining fee of 4.99% is now ... and thay gona do it to 10%? wow alot of ppl gona leave the pool if its going to 10%

Forum notification · · #13545

GregoryGHarding · · #13546

@ekan1975 :  thats the point

mickeekung · · #13547

All Steve said about diff problem is all of us need to wait until 6 August.

mickeekung · · #13548

Right?

ekan1975 · · #13549

lol so u tink is good low miner leaving and just all big ones is here ? @GregoryGHarding 

Forum notification · · #13550

has started a new topic: What does the below stats mean ?

Forum notification · · #13551

has started a new topic: Status as of Monday, July 31, 2017

GregoryGHarding · · #13552

@ekan1975 :  no, we should be focusing on ridding the miners that send in shares too rapidly, low diff for their equipment

GregoryGHarding · · #13553

@ekan1975 :  i dont agree that pool fees should go up, but that seems to be the stance the bros want to take to lower traffic

mickeekung · · #13554

#UASF BIP148 Countdown 0 Days 08 Hours 05 Minutes 30 Seconds

mjgraham · · #13555

I am wondering if we have figured out a way to handle 100x more shares or whatever why would any of this other stuff matter at the moment. Listen I will just straight up put it out there and it may not be popular, I need to be able to use the NH->PH thing I need a static diff, I also have my miners pointed here, I can afford 50 L3s or anymore hardware so I use the other option. Yes I am sure I was some of the cause my graphs didn’t indicate any issues when my stuff was running cause I am sensible about it at the most I was sending 20Gh maybe for periods of time, I could handle a smaller fee increase but as I see it I was making the pool 150~200 a day on top of what I was making some days better than others. I know everyone doesnt get to experience this and all I can say is I wasn’t until I put in the work, wrote programs learned to code better interfaced stuff . I am glad to talk about this issue

mjgraham · · #13556

*should have been can’t afford 50 L3s..

bji79 · · #13557

im new with Prohashing and i just try Litcoin Payout but im not recivie any thing for more than 30 hours until now

mjgraham · · #13558

how many LTC do you have ?

bji79 · · #13559

i tru first payout with 0.2 and second payout with 0.8 litecoin

bji79 · · #13560

so what is the problem ?

mjgraham · · #13561

says anything over .023 should pay out but normally that is if you have that at midnight and then sometime in morning, I am not sure I got a ltc payout either last night some times it takes a bit longer than expected

mjgraham · · #13562

yea looks like ltc didnt payout last night

wkying79 · · #13563

@GregoryGHarding: def agree. raising pool fees seems like a very complex way to solve a simple problem. lets display avg profitability only. get rid of the spikes in hash

bji79 · · #13564

ok, thank you for your replay i will wait more time

GregoryGHarding · · #13565

@mjgraham :  @bji79 :  litecoin payout didnt happen yet

bji79 · · #13566

GregoryGHarding ... why? litecoin payout didnt happen yet

GregoryGHarding · · #13567

no idea, i dont work here.. lol

bji79 · · #13568

:)

bji79 · · #13569

ok do you received your Payout before? because im make first Payout and not received until now

GregoryGHarding · · #13570

yes many times.. just delayed today

bji79 · · #13571

Litecoin Payout?

GregoryGHarding · · #13572

you have no worries, just be patient, sometimes the payout dosnt happen until late

bji79 · · #13573

Whicا wallet did you use for Litecoin?

bji79 · · #13574

Which wallet did you use for Litecoin?

GregoryGHarding · · #13575

i use coinomi, a android multiwallet

bji79 · · #13576

GregoryGHarding thank you bro for your help

GregoryGHarding · · #13577

no worries

Teo · · #13578

Can i have some help with bfgminer?

megaquake · · #13579

Teo wrote: Can i have some help with bfgminer?

Teo · · #13580

i tryed to setup d= parameter but from what i see doesn’t makes any change .

Jalapan · · #13581

Is it just me or are the payouts delayed?

AvPro · · #13582

@Teo :  static diff currently disabled if it results in too many shares. You will be auto changed to vardiff

C0ins · · #13583

Profitability looks like it’s crashing....lower than just mining LTC ... what’s going on?

pilottage · · #13584

its due to BIP1891918171 Alt’s prices down -> profits down, it’s normal... tomorrow after (BCC) noon you will rake the profits in.

tp31989 · · #13585

What’s up guys

Forum notification · · #13586

has started a new topic: Coin Addition Recomendation