Search found 41 matches

by ryguy
Sun Aug 19, 2018 8:33 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Status as of Sunday, August 19, 2018
Replies: 26
Views: 876

Re: Status as of Sunday, August 19, 2018

It was definitely a problem earlier, but appears to be working correctly now.
by ryguy
Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:34 am
Forum: Development
Topic: Need help from S9 owner
Replies: 23
Views: 975

Re: Need help from S9 owner

Steve, here are a couple of examples of what I was talking about. "version_bits must be null because this session did not request a version-rolling.mask. Provided version_bits: 20000000" "version_bits must be null because this session did not request a version-rolling.mask. Provided v...
by ryguy
Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:50 pm
Forum: News
Topic: Problem with share recording
Replies: 6
Views: 349

Re: Problem with share recording

Yes I didn't mean to imply that there was a problem with the shares being processed eventually, only that the processing was backing up because not all the recorders were running.

BTW it appears to be occurring again (EDIT: Looks like they've come back up as I posted this).
by ryguy
Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:23 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Need help from S9 owner
Replies: 23
Views: 975

Re: Need help from S9 owner

It was a 2 followed by however many 0s would be appropriate in that message. If I see that message again, I'll update with the full rejection message as I moved the S9 off this pool since it wasn't getting any hashrate accepted.
by ryguy
Thu Jul 26, 2018 3:57 am
Forum: Development
Topic: Need help from S9 owner
Replies: 23
Views: 975

Re: Need help from S9 owner

Actually I'd like to correct my previous statement. Some S9 are still having all of their hashrate rejected because of "version_bits must be null because this session did not request a version-rolling.mask". If it means anything it appears to always be a multiple of 10 shares which are bei...
by ryguy
Thu Jul 26, 2018 12:19 am
Forum: News
Topic: Problem with share recording
Replies: 6
Views: 349

Re: Problem with share recording

And now as predicted issues have started. Only a couple of share recorders are running and share recording is backing up by minutes. No reason to have only a few running at a time.
by ryguy
Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:28 pm
Forum: News
Topic: Problem with share recording
Replies: 6
Views: 349

Re: Problem with share recording

Oh ok. Sounds strange to me, but I suppose it saves on running a machine when it isn't needed? I'd likely opt to just run them all and spread the load as you mentioned, but at least explains why sometimes some don't appear in the list.
by ryguy
Tue Jul 24, 2018 12:33 pm
Forum: Development
Topic: Need help from S9 owner
Replies: 23
Views: 975

Re: Need help from S9 owner

Steve it appears that a lot of shares are now being rejected from S9's due to version_bits. This is going to cause the mining efficiency of S9's (and possibly other devices) to suffer on this pool.

EDIT: It appears this was a problem with a specific miner. Sorry for the confusion.
by ryguy
Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:33 pm
Forum: News
Topic: Problem with share recording
Replies: 6
Views: 349

Re: Problem with share recording

Is this why sometimes one or more of the share recorders does not show under the "share recorder info" section? Presently #7 is not displaying information.
by ryguy
Sat Jul 14, 2018 11:48 am
Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
Topic: Nicehash -> PH config
Replies: 1
Views: 350

Re: Nicehash -> PH config

What's wrong with -1% delta?