Status as of Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Discussion of development releases of Prohashing / Requests for features
Forum rules
The Development forum is for discussion of development releases of Prohashing and for feedback on the site, requests for features, etc.

While we can't promise we will be able to implement every feature request, we will give them each due consideration and do our best with the resources and staffing we have available.

For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Post Reply
User avatar
Steve Sokolowski
Posts: 4585
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
Location: State College, PA

Status as of Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Post by Steve Sokolowski » Tue Mar 27, 2018 2:07 pm

Good afternoon!
  • The current estimated date for the fiber installation is April 5. While we don't have a firm commitment to that date yet, it is more likely than not that, sometime next week, there will be a period where all services will be offline for the changeover. We'll post more about this outage when the final date is determined. We estimate that the new connection will reduce latency between Google and the server from 100ms to 15ms, along with other benefits.
  • SHA-256 mining is benefiting recently due to the profitability of merge-mining Unobtanium, so make sure to join before we gain so much hashrate that the benefit goes away.
  • A downside to this is that because we are mining bitcoins as the primary coin a lot of the time, the pool is almost certain to consistently lose money until a block is found. At any time, the expected amount of money we will lose before the next block is found is 69% of the block reward, or about $80,000. We still guarantee payouts within 24 hours, but the inconsistency of blocks may cause payout times to vary throughout the day until SHA-256 hashrate increases and provides regular earnings like scrypt does now.
  • Chris determined that it will not be feasible to run a Ripple node in our local environment. Ripple uses a ridiculous amount of bandwidth, which simply is unaffordable. Therefore, we will rely on the public Ripple nodes that the company provides. We figure that it would be foolish for them to log private keys, and if their nodes were ever compromised, the value of the Ripple network would decline so much that anything stolen from us would be worthless anyway. He's going to work on that tonight.
  • The mining servers are approaching full load. The components have arrived and Chris will double the number of mining servers around April 5.
  • I've been making some changes to the mining servers over the past few days to make them handle events, like new blocks, more effectively. Currently, when a block comes in, the mining servers send out work to all miners for that block, and then move on to the next task. But when everyone is mining litecoins and a new block comes in, it takes a long time to send that work, locking up the mining servers. The new code will periodically allow other things to be done during this process, and if another block comes in before all the work is sent, then the old work will never be sent. This change will improve performance (by sending less work), allow the server to prioritize what's important, and reduce the number of work restarts sent to miners. I suspect that these lockups are also causing miners to think the server isn't doing anything and disconnect, resulting in weird network connectivity issues.
DeterMINEd
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:14 pm

Re: Status as of Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Post by DeterMINEd » Tue Mar 27, 2018 3:08 pm

HI Steve, the bitcoin issue shouldn't affect payouts over the minimum limit should it? I have had this problem with prohashing about 4 months ago and I went to slushpool. I am however back and having the same issue with BTC payout, that is it doesn't pay out at the time it states it will. I have submitted a ticket again, but like last time I have had no reply. Thanks Steve.
User avatar
Steve Sokolowski
Posts: 4585
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
Location: State College, PA

Re: Status as of Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Post by Steve Sokolowski » Tue Mar 27, 2018 3:29 pm

DeterMINEd wrote:HI Steve, the bitcoin issue shouldn't affect payouts over the minimum limit should it? I have had this problem with prohashing about 4 months ago and I went to slushpool. I am however back and having the same issue with BTC payout, that is it doesn't pay out at the time it states it will. I have submitted a ticket again, but like last time I have had no reply. Thanks Steve.
No. Payouts won't be missed or delayed past the time limit, but they may occur later in the day on days we don't find blocks until the SHA-256 hashrate increases a bit.

I don't think that whatever issue you're having is related to this. I suggest submitting a support ticket and Chris will be glad to investigate for you.
DeterMINEd
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 8:14 pm

Re: Status as of Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Post by DeterMINEd » Tue Mar 27, 2018 3:37 pm

I have submitted a ticket this time as well as last time, I think previously, you may have done it manually as I got it at an obscure time of day, if I remember correctly. It is not important right this second but hopefully tomorrow I will be invoiced for the balance of the S9's I have ordered from Bitmain, as they are saying the bank wire I sent was short. I just don't want the order to expire as I have been waiting a while for the 14TH/s models to appear on their site. Should I get a confirmation to email that the ticket has been submitted?
Post Reply