more multiple workers than you really have

Encounter a problem related to the pool or have a request for a feature? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Forum rules
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.

Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.

We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.

For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Post Reply
oppresseddude
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm

more multiple workers than you really have

Post by oppresseddude » Sun Apr 08, 2018 8:54 pm

This may be beating a dead dog, I'm really not sure why i have more workers than i do miners. I can't name my miners because it causes an error 'duplicate miner submitting share' or some such. I have a hunch it's because my miners having roaming IP addresses. Anyone figure a cure for this?
oppresseddude
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by oppresseddude » Sun Apr 08, 2018 8:58 pm

One more fact to add is that this doesn't happen on Litecoinpool.org... not to be pessimistic about prohash. I just want to find a solution.
User avatar
Steve Sokolowski
Posts: 4585
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
Location: State College, PA

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by Steve Sokolowski » Sun Apr 08, 2018 10:22 pm

Check now. I think Chris fixed the network problems that were causing the issue.
lulzcart
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2018 6:25 am

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by lulzcart » Sun Apr 08, 2018 10:31 pm

it still doesn`t work
oppresseddude
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by oppresseddude » Mon Apr 09, 2018 3:10 am

No the fix didn't work. I'm getting 'undefined: 914.681 M/s (2) · Scrypt: (1)' in the worker section. Shouid only be one worker.
oppresseddude
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by oppresseddude » Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:06 am

With 2 miners, worker section is now saying 'undefined: 904.762 M/s (2) · Scrypt: 443.619 MH/s (1)'
oppresseddude
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by oppresseddude » Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:15 am

with 2 miners now it says 'undefined: 1.407 G/s (3)'
oppresseddude
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2018 3:24 pm

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by oppresseddude » Mon Apr 09, 2018 4:16 am

i wish that hashrate were really true lol
alim
Posts: 125
Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2018 3:08 pm

Re: more multiple workers than you really have

Post by alim » Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:48 pm

I get a similar message when rebooting the miners - I believe it is because the default for antminers is to test all the pools in order to kill any at the start in case failover is required.

The challenge is that due to the long pool time, the notice stays up for some time. I found that if I put in password arguments into each set including:

scan-time=7 expiry=28

that the message disappears quicker.

Hope this helps.

NB: There have been a few times when the miner shows that it has dual mined - eg submitted shares, but as I don't have an effectively way of checking the submissions, I am placing my trust that these have gone to my account.
Post Reply