Higher Diff improves share rejections

Encounter a problem related to the pool or have a request for a feature? Post your issue here and we will help you out.
Forum rules
Welcome to the System Support forum! Encounter a problem related to the pool? Post your issue here and we will help you out.

Keep in mind that the forums are monitored by PROHASHING less closely than the official support channels, so if you have a pressing issue, please submit an official support ticket so that our Support Analyst can look into your issue in a timely manner.

We cannot answer financial questions related to your account on a public forum, so those questions should always be submitted through the orange Support button on prohashing.com/about.

For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
Post Reply
User avatar
3Moose
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 6:14 pm

Higher Diff improves share rejections

Post by 3Moose » Tue Oct 10, 2017 10:27 pm

I ran a test where I turned the miner diff up to 262,144. This brought the rejected share count to one. Yes, one.

This should improves profitability because fewer rejections equals more credited shares in a PPS system.

Thoughts?
dog1965
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:27 am

Re: Higher Diff improves share rejections

Post by dog1965 » Tue Oct 10, 2017 11:12 pm

Hmmm, I wont comment Because I dont feel like getting flamed.
User avatar
AppleMiner
Posts: 736
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:44 pm

Re: Higher Diff improves share rejections

Post by AppleMiner » Wed Oct 11, 2017 12:12 am

How did it alter the profits? Did it raise or lower them compared to one you didn't alter?

No stales but recording less than half as many shares would still be less profits.
Was the stale count the only thing that changed when you added the d= setting?
Post Reply