War is upon us

Read about Prohashing, mining, and coins in general!
Forum rules
Sign up to be notified of new posts to the Prohashing Blog at http://eepurl.com/gx1e0j

For the full list of PROHASHING forums rules, please visit https://prohashing.com/help/prohashing- ... rms-forums.
User avatar
nicehash
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:19 am

Re: War is upon us

Post by nicehash » Fri Oct 14, 2016 5:26 am

Steve Sokolowski wrote:We concluded that the only possible cause was if the firmware on these miners was defective and hashing incorrectly or evaluating share difficulty incorrectly. Some Internet research suggested that some cloud mining providers like NiceHash were polluted with these misconfigured miners, but we were not able to correlate the miners with any specific cloud mining service or IP address.
Just for the record - NiceHash can NOT be polluted with a misconfigured miner. We have a very rigorous per-share validation implemented in our system. This means that each share, which is sent from a miner towards NiceHash and then forwarded to any target pool, is a regular and verified share. If share is invalid, it's rejected before it is forwarded to the target pool. More details on this topic is in this FAQ.

Best regards,
NiceHash team.
User avatar
Steve Sokolowski
Posts: 4585
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 3:27 pm
Location: State College, PA

Re: War is upon us

Post by Steve Sokolowski » Fri Oct 14, 2016 7:23 am

nicehash wrote:
Steve Sokolowski wrote:We concluded that the only possible cause was if the firmware on these miners was defective and hashing incorrectly or evaluating share difficulty incorrectly. Some Internet research suggested that some cloud mining providers like NiceHash were polluted with these misconfigured miners, but we were not able to correlate the miners with any specific cloud mining service or IP address.
Just for the record - NiceHash can NOT be polluted with a misconfigured miner. We have a very rigorous per-share validation implemented in our system. This means that each share, which is sent from a miner towards NiceHash and then forwarded to any target pool, is a regular and verified share. If share is invalid, it's rejected before it is forwarded to the target pool. More details on this topic is in this FAQ.

Best regards,
NiceHash team.
Thanks for the input. I think you might have misunderstood what the problem is. The shares that are submitted are valid and are getting through to the target pools as expected. The problem is that shares that find blocks are not submitted, leading to lower luck at the affected pool. Cloud mining providers, which do not earn revenue from finding blocks, can't prevent this problem because they don't even know what luck is supposed to be at the target pool.

However, you are correct that we were not able to find a correlation with any specific source of these shares, so there is no evidence that NiceHash is more likely to be a source for these issues than any other miner. The inaccurate suggestions that cloud mining services are solely responsible are found in Internet forums.
GenTarkin
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2015 10:52 am

Re: War is upon us

Post by GenTarkin » Sun Oct 30, 2016 3:27 am

Based off my brief experience in playing around w/ bfgminer source code ... I can see how easy it would be to do a simple "IF share diff > network diff THEN dont submit"
And you're right, launching an army of miners w/ that type of code against a pool ... would sure drive away other users from that pool due to the long running bad luck caused by witholding blocks.

Such a sad state crypto is in right now =( ...hopefully it will weather the storm ...
jacobmayes94
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 4:37 pm

Re: War is upon us

Post by jacobmayes94 » Sun Dec 25, 2016 7:07 am

tbf I have been reading this, a way to attack pools is simply pointing lots of hashpower via PPS and simply discard any solution over the current difficulty, also called a block withholding attack. That could explain the 'luck' where these miners were concerned. You said nicehash is polluted with these types, this has been suspect where rentals are concerned from there as it would encourage people to rent more as many rent hash from there in hopes to hit on CKs solo pool.
Post Reply