Search found 76 matches
- Sat Aug 17, 2019 8:59 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: 50% of time mining Bitconnectcoin
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2210
Re: 50% of time mining Bitconnectcoin
Are you sure you're looking at the right coin? I don't see Bitconnect listed in the live coins.
- Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:12 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Earnings problem under investigation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1837
Re: Earnings problem under investigation
This issue has been resolved. It turns out that when you declare a variable inside the scope of a "for" loop in Python, the variable still holds its value even after the loop is finished. In any other language, attempting to access the variable after the loop was finished would result in ...
- Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:36 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Upcoming downtime
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2110
Re: Upcoming downtime
The mining server isn't down, but live data is. I'm not sure that this post is related to the present issue.
- Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:17 pm
- Forum: Economics and investing
- Topic: If equity prices crashed by 50%, what would be the first things to buy?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9192
Re: If equity prices crashed by 50%, what would be the first things to buy?
Shouldn't that list be predicated on the cause of the crash?
- Mon Jan 21, 2019 10:53 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Problem discovered with equihash earnings
- Replies: 18
- Views: 9334
Re: Problem discovered with equihash earnings
Thanks for the fix Steve. I believe this is also impacting the profitability displayed by the pool for equihash.
Currently 0.00693691 BTC is being displayed as the profit, which if divided by 256 shows the true amount.
Currently 0.00693691 BTC is being displayed as the profit, which if divided by 256 shows the true amount.
- Sun Aug 19, 2018 8:33 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Sunday, August 19, 2018
- Replies: 26
- Views: 12912
Re: Status as of Sunday, August 19, 2018
It was definitely a problem earlier, but appears to be working correctly now.
- Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:34 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Need help from S9 owner
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11387
Re: Need help from S9 owner
Steve, here are a couple of examples of what I was talking about. "version_bits must be null because this session did not request a version-rolling.mask. Provided version_bits: 20000000" "version_bits must be null because this session did not request a version-rolling.mask. Provided v...
- Thu Jul 26, 2018 5:50 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Problem with share recording
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3053
Re: Problem with share recording
Yes I didn't mean to imply that there was a problem with the shares being processed eventually, only that the processing was backing up because not all the recorders were running.
BTW it appears to be occurring again (EDIT: Looks like they've come back up as I posted this).
BTW it appears to be occurring again (EDIT: Looks like they've come back up as I posted this).
- Thu Jul 26, 2018 1:23 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Need help from S9 owner
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11387
Re: Need help from S9 owner
It was a 2 followed by however many 0s would be appropriate in that message. If I see that message again, I'll update with the full rejection message as I moved the S9 off this pool since it wasn't getting any hashrate accepted.
- Thu Jul 26, 2018 3:57 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Need help from S9 owner
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11387
Re: Need help from S9 owner
Actually I'd like to correct my previous statement. Some S9 are still having all of their hashrate rejected because of "version_bits must be null because this session did not request a version-rolling.mask". If it means anything it appears to always be a multiple of 10 shares which are bei...