Search found 207 matches
- Mon Dec 25, 2017 6:19 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: no payment
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2065
Re: no payment
https://chain.so/address/LTC/LiW9fZDKLS2x1D6G1DqTei5XXjVjQ5uJep More easily shows what is coming in and what is going out. Most everything sent to the address you gave is within hours(usually) being sent to this address: https://chain.so/address/LTC/LQonK4j5VpdXWqSTskWQfrhA78M1hQn83t Which is receiv...
- Mon Dec 25, 2017 5:49 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: no payment
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2065
Re: no payment
According to this: http://explorer.litecoin.net/address/LiW9fZDKLS2x1D6G1DqTei5XXjVjQ5uJep All of those transactions made it to your account, and were taken out the same day they were put in. Though i could be reading that wrong. If i am reading it correctly though, and if you are not doing it, i co...
- Mon Dec 25, 2017 12:56 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Not payout received
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2523
Re: Not payout received
That's a lot of a lack of information you two have provided. Congrats.
- Sat Dec 23, 2017 10:43 pm
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Why is my hashrate showing 80% less
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3547
Re: Why is my hashrate showing 80% less
That's the purpose of the worker name...so...yes..........fynxgloire wrote:
Well should I separate each worker name for each machine?
- Thu Dec 21, 2017 9:34 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Changes to coin assignment
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2324
Re: Changes to coin assignment
any way to offer this more aggressive posture on a different port? I have no problem pointing a good portion of my miners towards to the more aggressive option but I'd not like to risk the downtime and constant reboots of my machines if they go sideways with the rapid switches. Then how would you c...
- Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:13 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Tuesday, December 19, 2017
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4117
Re: Status as of Tuesday, December 19, 2017
when server restarts throw off your miners, it is a problem. not asking for a time that suits me, just a scheduled time so i am aware and can make arrangements. i can't begin to count the number of times the servers have been restarted in the last two weeks alone. from all appearances there is no r...
- Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:08 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Bitcoin thresholds rising again
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8057
Re: Bitcoin thresholds rising again
You guys do realize the 5% fee we get takes care of the transaction fees right? Do you also realize that 5% of 1000 is $50, meaning 5% of 500 is obviously $25, which is BELOW the transaction fee? To expect the fee to stay at 500, when the the current average transaction fee is $32, would mean the 5%...
- Wed Dec 20, 2017 9:04 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Now free treshold Rise to $999???
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6027
Re: Now free treshold Rise to $999???
I mean we can all appreciate that transaction fees are gone up, but this is really bit excessive How is it excessive at all? No one is forcing you to use the free threshold. The only way it would be excessive is if you couldn't go below that threshold. You guys do realize the 5% fee we get takes ca...
- Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:55 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Profit Comparison 12/17/17-12/23/17
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2843
Re: Profit Comparison 12/17/17-12/23/17
Scrypt Pool Comparison - Two L3+ Sunday P2P- no blocks, PP 0.04854772 LTC Prohashing- $58.75 LTC Pool- 24 hours 0.19358136 LTC = $61.32 USD as of 12:03am Monday P2P- 1 block @ 0.08520656 LTC = 32.01 USD as of 12:08am Prohashing- $55.52 LTC Pool- 24 hours 0.18132340 LTC = $68.12 USD as of 12:08am Tu...
- Wed Dec 20, 2017 8:46 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Bitcoin payments policy changes
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9120
Re: Bitcoin payments policy changes
Is there a reason you publicly show everyone how much money is owed? I feel like that, itself is saying to potential hackers "Hey! here we are! This is how much bitcoins we have and the current value, as well as some other coins and their current value!"