Search found 76 matches
- Thu Jul 26, 2018 12:19 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Problem with share recording
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3122
Re: Problem with share recording
And now as predicted issues have started. Only a couple of share recorders are running and share recording is backing up by minutes. No reason to have only a few running at a time.
- Tue Jul 24, 2018 7:28 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Problem with share recording
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3122
Re: Problem with share recording
Oh ok. Sounds strange to me, but I suppose it saves on running a machine when it isn't needed? I'd likely opt to just run them all and spread the load as you mentioned, but at least explains why sometimes some don't appear in the list.
- Tue Jul 24, 2018 12:33 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Need help from S9 owner
- Replies: 23
- Views: 11552
Re: Need help from S9 owner
Steve it appears that a lot of shares are now being rejected from S9's due to version_bits. This is going to cause the mining efficiency of S9's (and possibly other devices) to suffer on this pool.
EDIT: It appears this was a problem with a specific miner. Sorry for the confusion.
EDIT: It appears this was a problem with a specific miner. Sorry for the confusion.
- Sat Jul 21, 2018 6:33 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Problem with share recording
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3122
Re: Problem with share recording
Is this why sometimes one or more of the share recorders does not show under the "share recorder info" section? Presently #7 is not displaying information.
- Sat Jul 14, 2018 11:48 am
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Nicehash -> PH config
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2264
Re: Nicehash -> PH config
What's wrong with -1% delta?
- Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:32 pm
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: why can't I connect to the equihash pool at prohashing?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4253
Re: why can't I connect to the equihash pool at prohashing?
Steve, I'm not certain that the error has to do with the mining.authorize. When a verification is successful it shows something like the following: Resolving pool host prohashing.com... OK Establishing connection with proxy... OK Establishing connection with pool 50.225.198.65:3334... OK Sending min...
- Sat Jul 07, 2018 4:23 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Potential change to live profitability calculation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 8768
Re: Potential change to live profitability calculation
I think, that profitability must be calculated with percentage weight of assigned miners: 1% -> weight 0.01 -> 1% of assigned miners to coin_1 10% -> weight 0.1 -> 10% of assigned miners to coin_1 70% -> weight 0.7 -> 70% of assigned miners to coin_1 and so on (weight_1 * coin_1_value + weight_2 * ...
- Sat Jul 07, 2018 2:04 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Potential change to live profitability calculation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 8768
Re: Potential change to live profitability calculation
......It would be akin to averaging out the winnings of a lottery without taking into account the odds. ... ... This metric doesn't necessarily need to take the place of the live profitability, but I believe it would be useful, especially for those of us using bots to determine whether we want to m...
- Sat Jul 07, 2018 1:17 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Potential change to live profitability calculation
- Replies: 17
- Views: 8768
Potential change to live profitability calculation
Hello, Because of the recent developments with the X11 algorithm and some coins producing an extremely high profitability for a very short period I believe there may be a need to change how the live profitability is presented. The current system reflects the average value of the last 250 shares, whi...
- Mon Jul 02, 2018 8:09 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Looking for more information about reduced hashrate miners
- Replies: 62
- Views: 29968
Re: Looking for more information about reduced hashrate miners
I would say that's most likely the case. There are definite periods of time on the chart where the 15 min period is greater than the amount of hashrate I could possibly have sent to the pool, so it is most likely just an issue with displaying/estimation .