Had BU activated a year ago, BTC would be dead by now and we'd all be transacting in LTC anyway.
There are more philosophic arguments to be had about your classification of ETC as an altcoin but otherwise this is a good analysis.
Search found 25 matches
- Sat May 13, 2017 10:56 am
- Forum: Prohashing Blog
- Topic: Anchor coins vs. altcoins
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6798
- Thu May 04, 2017 12:47 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Mining Wrong Coin
- Replies: 10
- Views: 6233
Re: Mining Wrong Coin
I seem to be mining nothing but DASH all of a sudden. I do not want ANYTHING to do with DASH, plz. ProHashPlz
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:47 am
- Forum: Prohashing Blog
- Topic: Setting the record straight on the Bitcoin Unlimited exchange statement
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7859
Re: Setting the record straight on the Bitcoin Unlimited exchange statement
He was just complaining about high fees and slow confirmations in his last post. Yes there's a problem. No, there's no problem. BTU is a mongoloid of buggy, insecure code that threatens the entire ecosystem. Of course we put the onus on them to ensure replay attacks aren't an issue. They're the ones...
- Sun Oct 23, 2016 1:52 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Suggestion: Wattage per miner via password argument
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3285
Re: Suggestion: Wattage per miner via password argument
Good positive stuff! Looking forward to more algos
- Sat Oct 22, 2016 2:33 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Suggestion: Wattage per miner via password argument
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3285
Suggestion: Wattage per miner via password argument
So I was just moving some miners from one 'datacenter' (corner of my house :D) to another and since I'm a little OCD and hate knowing my graphs are wrong I decided I had to change the wattage I was reporting to ProHashing to reflect the downtime for each miner as I moved them. Lucky for me we're onl...