Really encouraging news -
I like the analogy of more people moving into the houses . . I suppose it's a "nice" problem to have then, the problem of trying to keep up with increased demand from more customers
Search found 117 matches
- Tue Apr 25, 2017 10:07 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Tuesday, April 25, 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2675
- Sun Apr 23, 2017 12:00 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Sunday, April 23, 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2775
Re: Status as of Sunday, April 23, 2017
Nicehash is still a mess - I did a few test jobs but terrible results, I suppose until the server performance issues are resolved the issues with stale and reject shares will persist.
- Sun Apr 23, 2017 8:18 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Sunday, April 23, 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2775
Re: Status as of Sunday, April 23, 2017
Hey Steve, I'll setup a lower hashrate order on Nicehash and let run awhile, and post a link to the perf graph after a while. I'll start without setting a static coin and use "h=50" , test a while, then do one more with "c="
- Fri Apr 21, 2017 10:41 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
- Replies: 52
- Views: 31176
Re: Forcing activation of SegWit on Litecoin
Interesting developments - https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/litecoi ... ice-rises/
- Tue Apr 18, 2017 5:57 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: To all Scrypt Miners on Prohashing
- Replies: 20
- Views: 13244
Re: To all Scrypt Miners on Prohashing
Resetting to mine litecoin now !
Done, and to hell with some lost profits . .let's do this thing!
Done, and to hell with some lost profits . .let's do this thing!
- Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:54 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Sunday April 16
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6638
Re: Status as of Sunday April 16
Update re: Nicehash issue with password arguments - Member named spauk in the other thread pointed out that it's now necessary to explicitly set a=scrypt before it will accept the d= value. In other words, allowing it to default to scrypt causes it to also default to var. def regardless of settings....
- Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:46 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Password configs not working anymore
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4208
Re: Password configs not working anymore
Brilliant, does indeed work!