Search found 4559 matches
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 12:55 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Release to occur this afternoon
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4294
Release to occur this afternoon
We promised a release last night, but were unable to execute it because when we were restoring from backup onto a new array of larger disks, we had copied the Subversion repository first and then accidentally overwrote it later in the day. We had to restore it again and then check in the code this m...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 10:08 am
- Forum: Non-market discussion
- Topic: VproCoin
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1439
Re: VproCoin
We don't make any warranties or conduct any examinations of whether coins will succeed or fail. Since coins have no central authority, there is nobody who can control a coin's issuance once it is released. We take our own profits in dollars, so we sell everything that isn't owed to customers and don...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 10:06 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: The WSS gives erroneous data
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5771
Re: The WSS gives erroneous data
I use nicehash and got good deltas with differences between my payment for the hash and the payment that shows your wss of more than 20% and I get lost over 10%. This earlier did not work this way. You can confirm if you have any errors. Thank you. Have you checked to see whether NiceHash is applyi...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:23 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: "This miner attempted to authenticate with a duplicate worker name, so its n= password argument is being ignored." but..
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2787
Re: "This miner attempted to authenticate with a duplicate worker name, so its n= password argument is being ignored." b
Thanks - I executed a proper disconnect using the Miner Settings, Save & Apply with unchanged settings and that cleared the error. I appreciate the help! I'm going to change this behavior so that the oldest session that is associated with the worker name receives this error, instead of the newe...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:20 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Really??? Scrypt MH/S/day profitability 2,3cent?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1450
Re: Really??? Scrypt MH/S/day profitability 2,3cent?
Hi everyone! i just spent lots of time today watching live profitability indicator an am just wondering from where this 2,32 cent are coming... lowest what i could see today was round 2,6 cent, highest round 9 cent. pretty much (i would say 30% of the time) indicator was moving between 3,3 and 4,5 ...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:19 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: d= is disabled ?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2732
Re: d= is disabled ?
minimum static diff is 16384 server was flooded with easy shares so minimum was raised This change was reverted and the original difficulty of 2048 is now available again. However, we lowered the maximum number of shares per second from 5 to 1. That allows slow miners who need the minimum difficult...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:18 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Mining Adress and diff for Prohash
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4286
Re: Mining Adress and diff for Prohash
Try using: stratum+tcp://prohashing.com:3333 But the site has to be up and running at the time. Use the username for the account you login to check on things, it has to be spelled CASE-SENSITVE when you made the account. So, Bobbie and BOBBIE are not the same, make sure you spell it exactly with sa...
- Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:16 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Steve/Chris: Issue with botting user
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7144
Re: Steve/Chris: Issue with botting user
Hi Greg, I looked at this issue and determined that the changes that were made recently will discourage miners from doing what you described. What you pointed out isn't profitable now. Most of the blocks submitted when a person mines extremely easy networks like that are stale, because there can onl...
- Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:26 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Saturday, September 30, 2017
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2724
Status as of Saturday, September 30, 2017
Good afternoon! On Thursday, a change was made that caused some miners with high difficulties to earn less than they should have. I corrected the problem and Chris issued share corrections. Those who were affected received the usual 15% bonus. Static coin miners and low difficulty miners were not af...
- Sat Sep 30, 2017 1:16 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Chris to issue share corrections
- Replies: 17
- Views: 8292
Re: Chris to issue share corrections
These corrections were paid and everything should be back to normal.