Search found 58 matches
- Mon Mar 05, 2018 10:30 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Equihash now available
- Replies: 23
- Views: 15142
Re: Equihash now available
I am using awesome miner and it handles the arguments ok when enclosed with quotes. I think someone was having problems on chat with a web-based GUI that sounds like it was encoding the quotes or just stripping them.
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:08 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Free money for yesterday's network connectivity issues
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5566
Re: Free money for yesterday's network connectivity issues
If restarts are reducing profitability, then he should see an increase if he set g=off, as that should reduce the number of restarts issued to the L3+ units, no?
- Mon Feb 26, 2018 9:03 am
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Friday, February 23, 2018
- Replies: 32
- Views: 23830
Re: Status as of Friday, February 23, 2018
The Higher scrypt profitability is because they are mining Scrypt twords Verge with merge mined VIa and DOGE. This is also why you notice so many people coming on to live chat trying to get Verge solo mining working. Its running about 109% LTC for yesterday. What I don't understand is why the algos ...
- Sat Feb 24, 2018 3:47 pm
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Poor Connection
- Replies: 12
- Views: 8436
Re: Poor Connection
If its visable from the pool side, perhaps a pop-up notice on the earnings page. A prohashing clippy that says "It looks like your using bfgminer. Do you need some help?"
- Fri Feb 23, 2018 8:55 pm
- Forum: Mining rig and connectivity support
- Topic: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5763
Re: Comparison between litecoinpool and prohashing - How to reconcile configuration?
Hi - I just started to mine under prohashing. Previously I was mining under litecoinpool and wanted to try mining multiple coins. I see some performance differences and am hoping it's related to my prohashing configuration that can be tweaked somehow before I move the larger part of my setup. LITEC...
- Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:32 am
- Forum: News
- Topic: First poll, need nominations for choices
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10287
Re: First poll, need nominations for choices
This is kinda of stream of consciousness and stream of vodka. So profits -- A cursory look would tend to suggest that if PH's Scrypt earnings for the day is less than 7% over the straight litecoin value, then other pools, such as litecoinpool would be more profitable. This is also assuming payouts a...
- Mon Feb 19, 2018 12:18 pm
- Forum: Development Discussion and Feedback
- Topic: Status as of Sunday, February 18, 2018
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4745
Re: Status as of Sunday, February 18, 2018
Sunday 2/19 or 2/25?
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:22 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Forfeited balance Problem
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2666
Re: Forfeited balance Problem
Sounds like you may be getting hit with the low-luck miner penalty. Unreasonably low luck and socialized losses Some miners have unreasonably low luck. While all miners can have streaks of poor luck in finding blocks, some mining rigs are so unlucky that the number of blocks they submit to the pool ...
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:18 am
- Forum: System support
- Topic: Lost blocks for linda
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8869
Re: Lost blocks for linda
The daemon for the coin is in error. Continuing to mine that coin will just increase your loss.
- Tue Jan 30, 2018 10:30 pm
- Forum: News
- Topic: Possible changes to static coin mining
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7176
Re: Possible changes to static coin mining
Impose an undocumented feature fee on mined coin of 50% to discourage this behavior. Socialize the fee into the rest of the pool for other miners. S